Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Beauden Barrett was stiffed by the All Blacks but we can't make the same mistake with Richie Mo'unga

Beauden Barrett and All Blacks teammates look on dejected following their loss to Ireland in Dublin last year. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The 2019 All Blacks ought to have been Beauden Barrett’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

He’d been the backline utility at a Rugby World Cup, behind Daniel Carter. He’d led the Hurricanes to a maiden Super Rugby title and twice been named World Rugby player of the year.

If ever a man had served the right apprenticeship to dictate an All Blacks’ world cup campaign, it was Barrett.

Video Spacer

All Access with Maro Itoje

Jim Hamilton is reunited with Vitality ambassador and former teammate @maroitoje before he jets off to South Africa for the British & Irish Lions Series.
Itoje told Jim Hamilton all about what has inspired him to be the best person that he can be in rugby and in life. @vitality_uk

Video Spacer

All Access with Maro Itoje

Jim Hamilton is reunited with Vitality ambassador and former teammate @maroitoje before he jets off to South Africa for the British & Irish Lions Series.
Itoje told Jim Hamilton all about what has inspired him to be the best person that he can be in rugby and in life. @vitality_uk

Only he never got that chance to own the team’s performances from first five-eighth. Injury or luck didn’t intervene, just the preference of New Zealand’s selection panel to play Richie Mo’unga at 10.

No matter how good your captain or how strong your senior leadership group, a team still belongs to its first five-eighth. He’s the man that so much revolves around and the player who has to have absolute confidence in his ability, but more importantly his position in the side.

If a first five-eighth feels his place is under any threat, he will not perform to his potential.

Barrett was badly let down by New Zealand’s selectors and coaches, just as we seem destined to undermine Mo’unga in the same way. It’s madness not to entrust one man with the on-field running of a team, but we seem determined to keep doing it.

It’s the definition of insanity in that regard.

Who knows whether Barrett or Mo’unga is truly the best first-five. And, at this rate, we’ll never know.

ADVERTISEMENT

Until one can play without the continual presence of the other, we’ll never be any the wiser.

The Barrett of 2016 was sensational and he carried that form into the next season’s Super Rugby competition. Come 2017’s series against the British & Irish Lions, though, he had to cede the running of the All Blacks to Aaron Cruden.

Cruden became the team’s nominal finisher, coming on at 10 and shunting Barrett to fullback. At a time when the ball simply had to be in Barrett’s hands as often as possible, he was playing second fiddle instead.

Along came Mo’unga after that and here we are now.

For as long as All Blacks coach Ian Foster declines to say or do anything definitive at first five-eighth, we’ll continue to have questions and debate about whether Barrett or Mo’unga ought to be starting. And playing the former at fullback is no solution, as we’ve seen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two playmakers sounds great, but in effect Mo’unga and Barrett are only half the player when the other is in the side.

But Foster, as he’s shown since the Cruden and Barrett days, is a man who likes to have a bob each way. As remains the case now, with his wait and see approach to the running of this team.

It’s as if he hopes injury – or a catastrophic loss of form – will dictate things for him, eliminating the necessity to tell Barrett or Mo’unga that there’s only room for one of them.

Indecision off the park, breeds indecision on it.

Mo’unga – as she’s shown innumerable times – knows the Crusaders belong to him. There’s not a doubt in his mind about his status in that team or his ability to determine the outcome of matches.

He’s now – two years out from the next World Cup – in the same spot Barrett was in 2017. Mo’unga’s done everything he can to show he’s ready to take full ownership of the All Blacks; he now just needs the freedom to prove it.

Equally, at 30, it’s not too late for Barrett. It just requires someone in responsibility to actually make a decision about which first five-eighth New Zealand’s 2023 Rugby World Cup hopes will rest upon.

What we can’t have, though, is Mo’unga, Barrett and the team continuing to be strung along.

Tom Brady doesn’t job-share as an NFL quarterback. He’s not shifted to wide receiver to accommodate an understudy. Brady is the leader of every team he plays in and it would be ludicrous to lessen that in any fashion.

And yet, here we are, perpetuating a situation in which the position of All Blacks first five-eighth remains contestable.

Beauden Barrett was done a disservice by the All Blacks and now we’re doing the same disservice to Richie Mo’unga.

Until one or the other is afforded a clean slate, the All Blacks will continue to be a side in which no-one takes ownership for the winning and losing of big matches.

Coaching is about providing players with the best opportunity to be successful, but neither Barrett nor Mo’unga will ever truly succeed while the other remains in the side.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Standout women's rugby moments of 2024 Standout women's rugby moments of 2024
Search