Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Beau's Plan - What Carlos can bring to Beauden's game

Beau’s Plan

The King has returned.

The Blues best ever first five has returned to his hometown franchise – the Levin-born playmaker will join the Hurricanes coaching staff as an assistant in 2019. There he will be in a position to work with and mentor the Hurricanes best ever 10, Beauden Barrett.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is an intriguing partnership that can help Barrett’s game evolve and remain at a high level during his late twenties – he will be 27-years-old at the end of the month. It is inevitable that he will lose some of the speed that makes him the world’s most dangerous player over the next couple years.

The Hurricanes pivot hasn’t been playing at the superhuman level he reached during 2016 and 2017. His timing on the pass can be off at times. He’s running more but breaking the line, and tackles, less. His most valuable asset is still his innate ability to score against the run of play – he has a sixth sense for an opportunist try and seems to know where the ball will bounce. This special vision can change a game, even when things aren’t going to plan.

The mentorship of Carlos will hopefully round out Barrett’s game, to become more of a playmaker out of the hand with the pass, where he can manipulate defenders and put others away. If he can develop a supreme passing game while still at his peak physically, there’s will be no stopping him. If he can do it over the next few years, he could well be a force in Super Rugby well into his thirties.

Deep/flat

Barrett has become distribution-centric in the Hurricanes system, mapping phases across the field in methodical fashion. He has a set role within the 1-3-3-1 that usually involves providing a back door option for the first pod and then linking the second pod from first receiver.

His brilliance usually comes from counter attack and against the run of play, while simply facilitating ball movement during phases.

Barrett stand about 8-metres deep at first receiver which makes it hard for the Hurricanes second pod to reach the gain line.
ADVERTISEMENT
As he pivots to release the ball, he has moved forward about half a metre.

 

Often at first receiver he is so deep the team doesn’t make the gain line. There seems to be little care factor as to whether the midfield ruck makes a net loss. The Hurricanes rely more on the speed of the recycle to create space for the next phase. If they can generate a one-second ruck it allows Barrett to flatten up and ball play on the third phase with the rest of his backline

Although there is one reason for the deep set up – the kick-pass. This has become Barrett’s signature go-to for killing teams with exposed 15-metre channels. Being so deep keeps the kick-pass open at all times. Barrett can assess the line speed, hear the call or see the space wide and make the kick.

On the next phase, Barrett flattens up at a much shorter distance to attack the line.
ADVERTISEMENT

He may have one chance every three phases to play at the line, and that’s if they don’t release the backs on the swivel pass during the second phase or play any short sides switches off Perenara off the first. In all likelihood, it might be one in eight phases under the current gameplan where he has an opportunity to attack the line.

This can be expanded with small tweaks – using the swivel on the first phase more, becoming more diverse at first receiver allowing Barrett to pop up elsewhere or attaching a blind winger to Barrett’s hip at first receiver on the second phase.

There are times where it seems he just has to facilitate, giving him a range of options allows for more playmaking. With Carlos’s tutorship on some of the finer details of deceptive trickery and an increase of in the number of situations Beauden can deploy them, we could see him open up teams more from phase play.

Set Piece

However, the current role Barrett has during phase play works – he is able to facilitate the distribution of the ball and get it in the hands of the power backs like Laumape and Aso early. The number one area of the game set for playmaking growth in Barrett’s game is the set piece.

Currently playmaking duties from the set piece are shared with TJ Perenara, who offers another option for the Hurricanes. A number of the play designs often involved the halfback making the read on the run, with Barrett sweeping out the back. Along with TJ, Laumape also receives a high number of carries from the scrum to utilise his bulldozing power.

On the few times the play allows for Barrett to attack the line and have option runners, there hasn’t been much success. Often these plays result in a negative one – the ball on the ground or turnovers. This is a significant area of the game that Carlos will be able to provide help, not just Barrett but the whole Hurricanes backline. They have not been efficient at manipulating the defence to create gaps for their runners on strike plays.

Barrett’s playmaking is set to improve under Spencer’s guidance, and with his running game due to decline over the next few seasons, the addition could prove a masterstroke.

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 24 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search