Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Before he came, I don't think the Boks had addressed some of the stuff we struggled with'

YOKOHAMA, JAPAN - SEPTEMBER 21: Head coach Rassie Erasmus of South Africa is seen prior to the Rugby World Cup 2019 Group B game between New Zealand and South Africa at International Stadium Yokohama on September 21, 2019 in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

World Cup-winning loosehead Tendai Mtawarira has lauded Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus, giving an insight into a man who refuses to accept the status quo.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on the Rugby World Cup 2023 Official Podcast in Paris, the former Bok prop heaped praise on his former coach, hailing him as a trailblazer who never hesitates to challenge the norms in rugby. Mtawarira’s remarks shed light on the unique coaching style and leadership qualities of Erasmus, which have made a significant impact on the sport.

Reflecting on his time under Erasmus’s tutelage, Mtawarira remarked: “He likes to go against the grain a little bit.”

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The former Springbok player was quick to acknowledge Erasmus’s impressive achievements, emphasizing the respect he has for the coach. However, he also acknowledged that Erasmus’s tendency to express his opinions vehemently in the media was unexpected to some, saying, “Yes, I know he got his rants in the media. Sometimes he does things you wouldn’t expect of him, but he’s that kind of guy. He likes to shake the tree a bit.”

At the core of Erasmus’s personality is an unwillingness to accept the status quo.

“He’s the type of guy who doesn’t accept things as they are. If there’s something wrong and he doesn’t agree with it, he’s going to speak up.”

This refusal to accept mediocrity has been pivotal in driving positive change within the Springbok team.

Mtawarira also recognized the transformative impact Erasmus had on the team’s culture. Before the coach’s arrival, the Springboks struggled to address certain cultural issues. Mtawarira explained, “Before he came, I don’t think the Springboks had addressed some of the stuff that we used to struggle with, with our culture. We didn’t really embrace the diversity and landscape of South Africa. He’s very good at speaking about the elephant in the room.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He does that in the media. He addresses stuff with the referees. It might make a few people uncomfortable, but I think in the end, the end goal is achieved.”

In the aftermath of the pool stage loss to New Zealand in the 2019 World Cup in Japan, the then head coach’s impact was key.

“The changing room was quiet. We made little errors which cost us the game in the end.

“The players literally had doubt on their faces. I had doubt on my face. We’d been concentrating for two years on his specific game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There was one man in that changing room that was positive. It was Rassie. He straight up said. ‘I promise you. I’ll show you the footage. We didn’t play badly. We just made a few errors. We can fix them and go on and win the World Cup’.

“I believed him. It took a little bit of time.’

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
S
Silk 494 days ago

Even as a player he spoke up. He made it clear when he disagreed, which of course didn't sit well with some coaches. He did in depth video analysis of the opposition while he was playing. That was years ago before it was the norm. He has always thought outside the box. In many ways he has changed rugby world wide. Like him or hate him.

C
CT 494 days ago

Agree he's been a catalyst for the boks he has brought in a new era of boks and set a powerful foundation for the future

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 10 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 23 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scottish Rugby set for huge Duhan van der Merwe shaped boost Scottish Rugby set for huge Duhan van der Merwe shaped boost
Search