Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Best back row in the Premiership? The top six contending depth charts

Tom Curry celebrates alongside his twin brother Ben Curry as Sale Sharks beat Saracens. (Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)

From contesting at the breakdown to leading the defensive line, and often taking on core roles as primary ball-carriers, lineout targets and providing ball-security, a lot is demanded of the modern back row forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

They aren’t considered to have the same influence on a game that the half-backs do and when the set-piece is discussed, all eyes go to the front and second rows, but the loose forwards’ impact on a game is usually up there with the most significant of contributors to the final outcome.

After an apparent dearth of traditional opensides in previous Rugby World Cup cycles to the abundance of young talent emerging at the position currently, English rugby and the Gallagher Premiership’s back rows are seemingly always a topic of conversation.

Those aforementioned emerging talents, coupled with a summer of noteworthy recruitment, have the standout Premiership back rows looking in pretty good shape ahead of the 2019/20 season.

We’ve put together depth charts for the top six units in the competition, but which looks strongest with the new season looming?

Sale Sharks

1st string – Jean-Luc du Preez, Tom Curry, Jono Ross

ADVERTISEMENT

2nd string – Mark Wilson, Ben Curry, Dan du Preez

3rd string – Cameron Neild, Sam Dugdale, Josh Beaumont

The arrivals of the du Preez twins and Wilson catapult an already impressive Sale unit into contention with the best in the league. The first- and second-string groups, as listed here, are interchangeable and may well look different to the club’s coaching staff, as there is clearly no lack of talent or possible combinations.

Dugdale is a bright talent in the club’s senior academy and if Neild is viewed primarily as a hooker and Beaumont as a lock – despite the signing of Lood de Jager – then Teddy Leatherbarrow, Ciaran Booth and Sam Moore come into the mix.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bath

1st string – Zach Mercer, Sam Underhill, Taulupe Faletau

2nd string – Tom Ellis, Josh Bayliss, Francois Louw

3rd string – Mike Williams, Miles Reid, Nahum Merigan

If the award were simply for the most exciting back row, it would probably have to go to Bath. Mercer and Faletau are superb ball-carriers and in Underhill, Louw and Bayliss, Bath have three predatory breakdown threats, all of whom are capable of providing transition attack opportunities.

Ellis and Williams bring work rate to the blindside and Merigan is a name worth keeping an eye on over the next few seasons, having excelled as a ball-carrier in the U18s for the last couple of years.

Leicester Tigers

1st string – Jordan Taufua, Guy Thompson, Hanro Liebenberg

2nd string – David Denton, Tommy Reffell, Sione Kalamafoni

3rd string – Sam Lewis, Henri Lavin, Jordan Coghlan

Leicester make the cut due to their impressive recruitment of Taufua and Liebenberg, which gives them a first-string group that is a match for anyone else in the competition. It’s tough to say the depth is there that both Sale and Bath boast, though.

The likes of Lewis, Reffell and Lavin will have their hearts set on making an impact this season and proving their worth, something which could help Leicester’s projected depth chart for the coming years look much more solid.

Harlequins

1st string – Chris Robshaw, Semi Kunatani, Alex Dombrandt

2nd string – Renaldo Bothma, Jack Clifford, James Chisholm

3rd string – Archie White, Will Evans, Tom Lawday

It doesn’t have some of the bigger names that the Sale and Bath groups do, but Quins have assembled a pretty solid unit of loose forwards. If Kunatani keeps acclimatising to English rugby, Robshaw continues to prosper without the demands of international rugby and Dombrandt makes another leap, that starting trio could cause plenty of problems.

Premiership back row
Alex Dombrandt was one of the finds of the 2018/19 season. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Injuries have held Bothma and Clifford back, although their ability on the pitch is not questioned, and Chisholm caps a very impressive second group. Evans, who was highly thought of by Eddie Jones a couple of seasons ago, has moved down from Leicester and will be hopeful of realising his significant potential under Paul Gustard’s tutelage.

Wasps

1st string – Brad Shields, Thomas Young, Nizaam Carr

2nd string – Tom Willis, Jack Willis, Sione Vailanu

3rd string – Ben Morris, Will Wilson, Alex Rieder

Wasps’ fortunes overall may have taken a tumble last season, but even with the departure of Nathan Hughes, they can still put together three rather formidable back row groups. If the Willis brothers can stay fit and kick on next season, they’ll push for inclusion in that first-string group, too.

Wales’ plethora of opensides, South Africa’s wealth of back row options and England’s burgeoning group of young loose forwards will all be positives for Wasps in terms of the availability of Young, Carr and the Willis brothers during international windows.

Gloucester

1st string – Ruan Ackermann, Jaco Kriel, Ben Morgan

2nd string – Lewis Ludlow, Aaron Hinkley, Jake Polledri

3rd string – Freddie Clarke, Josh Gray, Jack Clement

The success of the Cherry and White group could ride on whether or not Kriel can still fit. When he is, the South African is among the best opensides in world rugby, although there’s no denying that injuries have held him back in recent seasons. The consistency of Ackermann and Morgan was key to Gloucester’s trip to the playoffs earlier this year.

Polledri brings international class, too, although the second- and third-string groups are heavy on potential, with Hinkley coming off the back of two impressive seasons with the England U20s and both Gray and Clement likely to be in that mix for 2019/20. Some teams may have slightly more established depth at the position, such as Exeter Chiefs, but Gloucester are fortunate to avoid too many international call-ups in most windows.

Watch: Premiership clubs to avoid Brexit uncertainty over player eligibility

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search