Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

A billionaire, the awful 'unknown' and a battle for a sport's very survival

The Germany v Samoa Rugby World Cup 2019 qualifying match in Heidelberg, Germany.

Few people gave Germany a chance ahead of their 2019 Rugby World Cup play-off second leg against Samoa on Saturday. But in Heidelberg, the collective will of the players, coaching staff and fans almost produced the biggest result of the country’s rugby history.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a battle between two teams that have had their fair share of off-the-field issues to deal with of late, Samoa had taken a decisive step towards Japan with a 66-15 win in the opening encounter in Apia.

On arrival at the sun-baked Fritz-Grunebaum-Sportpark, though, it was impossible not to appreciate the sense of community. It pervaded from the makeshift gazebos selling rugby equipment, to the stands cooking up grilled meat and dishing out cold beer, to the fans taking their seats in hope rather than expectation.

This was a day for German rugby to display its unity following a turbulent season. The impasse between the German Rugby Federation (DRV) and Dr. Hans-Peter Wild, the Stade Francais owner born a leisurely bike ride away from the game’s venue, had first resulted in a player strike at the end of last year and ultimately ended with the businessman walking away completely last month.

Dr Wild had set up his Wild Academy more than a decade ago to produce the players that could help the national team qualify for the World Cup. In June – less than 10 days before the crucial play-off against Portugal – he withdrew his funding, plunging the majority of the German squad and coaching staff into imminent unemployment.

Samoa’s visit represented a chance for the rugby community to show that the sport would survive. Having been switched from the 13,500-capacity Brit-Arena in Wiesbaden at late notice due to security issues, and despite an outmoded booking system, all 2,500 tickets released on advance sale had been snapped up.

ADVERTISEMENT

A healthy Samoan support – Germany’s Pacific Island diaspora boosted by fans travelling to Heidelberg from Dublin and London – had helped swell the attendance by at least another 1,000 on match day.

Moreover, the draw of watching their national side test itself against an established World Cup side proved too attractive for many local fans to turn down.

“Essentially Germany is a really sport-mad country and they wanna see their teams perform at the highest level,” home lock Luke Dyckhoff said. “The bigger the team we play, the more amazing the atmosphere.”

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The DRV’s new president, Robin Stalker, was also in attendance for the first time – having been sworn in only six days previously – and fans arrived sporting the full variety of colours from the country’s top two leagues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stalker would not be the most high profile spectator in this unheralded corner of Heidelberg, however. Dr Wild had branded the DRV amateurish during an interview last month, but hints that he might have a change of heart were hard to ignore.

Capri-Sun branding (Wild owns the drinks brand) absent for Germany’s previous home game at this stadium was back on show, while former Germany international and Stade Francais sporting director, Robert Mohr, mingled with players and staff he once worked alongside at the academy’s base over the road.

It had been intimated ahead of the Portugal game that Dr Wild would have received a hot reception had he shown his face last month.

On Saturday, he arrived close to kick-off and kept a low profile as the match ensued. The only outward evidence that he was there at all coming – bar a giant inflatable Capri-Sun carton on one touchline – from a banner unfurled in the second half by Heidelberger RK fans in support of their former benefactor.

Not everyone involved in German rugby shares that sentiment. His decision to divert funds from Heidelberg to Paris coming at a time when they were needed it most.

The DRV – an organisation which relies on the hard work of dedicated volunteers to function at all – struggled to find the cash needed to fulfil the two legs of this qualifier. Dr Wild has agreed to honour all academy contracts until September, but the uncertainty has cast a cloud over the national team’s preparations.

Samoa’s players would certainly be able to empathise given their own continued struggles, but they were not in charitable mood in Apia a fortnight ago as they ran in 10 tries.

Germany made their protracted return from the southern hemisphere determined to make up for their defensive shortcomings.

“We decided as a group that we wanted to show what we are all about, and show some character,” Germany second-row Timo Vollenkemper said afterwards. “We didn’t really care about the result, just to come off the pitch with our heads held high and perform like we can do, and should have done before.”

However, as Ed Fidow touched down for the game’s first try within a minute of kick-off it looked like bravado at best.

But this team has become closer in adversity and wrestled back control of the contest almost immediately. Tries from Jaco Otto, his third of the tie, and Samy Fuchsel allied to a Chris Hilsenbeck penalty on the stroke of half-time remarkably gave Germany a 15-14 lead at the break.

It was not a score that flattered the home team either, and as EDM belted out over the stadium tannoy the crowd allowed itself an opportunity to dream once more. Qualification into Pool A might have disappeared in Apia but the hosts were proving themselves worthy of this level.

Samoa, by contrast, looked as though their prime minister’s harsh words were still ringing in their ears. The visitors’ lineout failed to function from the first minute, while simple handling errors in midfield were proving costly.

When Marcel Coetzee stepped up to send a penalty from just inside his own half bobbing, in virtual slow-motion, over the crossbar with less than 15 minutes remaining a place in the history books was up for grabs. The home fans could barely believe it, every catch, mark, pass and kick from a player in white was cheered raucously.

Unfortunately, crowd support is not always enough to see a team over the line, and so it proved. Ah See Tuala, twice, and Fidow stepped up to deliver three tries in the final 11 minutes – two of which came in the last 180 seconds – to deny their hosts a victory that would live long in the memory.

As referee Matthew Carley’s whistle confirmed a 42-28 victory for Samoa, the mood in Heidelberg remained upbeat. While the visitors, and their fans, celebrated their World Cup qualification the home side huddled yards away, regaining focus on the challenge to come in November.

Canada, Hong Kong and the 2018 Africa Gold Cup runner-up stand between Germany and a place in Pool B in Japan. No one who was there on Saturday would bet against them making it.

Replacement lock Dyckhoff was left to reflect on the roller coaster nature of the sport. “You’re always guaranteed a down after an up and then when you’re down there’s always going to be an up,” he said.

“So, it’s best just to play every game like it’s your last with the guys you’ve worked so hard with and that’s what the guys were focusing on so hard this week.

“Just putting that (uncertainty) aside, because it is hard, it has affected people mentally, as it would any human being. That unknown is awful.

“But as the guys showed (on Saturday), they’re great friends and they’re great rugby players.”

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 33 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Top 100: Why do the best players come from the best teams? Top 100: Why do the best players come from the best teams?
Search