Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bizarre kick tennis scenes in Murrayfield could see end of 'Dupont Law'

Australian referee Nic Berry (R) speaks with captains France's flanker Charles Ollivon (L) and Scotland's fly-half Finn Russell (C) as a decision on whether Scotland have scored a late try is considered during the Six Nations international rugby union match between Scotland and France at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland on February 10, 2024. France won the game 20-16. (Photo by Andy Buchanan / AFP) (Photo by ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Some bizarre kick tennis scenes at Murrayfield today could yet spark the potential abolition of the so-called ‘Dupont Law’.

ADVERTISEMENT

France beat Scotland 20-16 in their Guinness Six Nations clash, with a late TMO decision adding some much-needed drama to what was at times a difficult watch for rugby fans.

What caught the eye during the match were episodes of kick tennis that have not been witnessed since the infamous Law Variations of the late 2000s.

Kick tennis has seen a resurgence of late, with the practice dubbed the Dupont Law emerging in the Top 14. It refers not to an actual rule change but to the exploitation of a loophole within rugby’s existing framework. The loophole allows players excessive time to execute kicks by taking advantage of opponents being offside — a scenario that played out painfully at Murrayfield.

For several minutes, opposing kickers on both teams stood motionless, exploiting this loophole to the fullest.

They did this by not advancing five metres or passing the ball, thereby keeping opposition players in an offside position. This tactic, while legal, led to a standstill as kickers took their own good time to return fire with a kick and put opposing players back on side, as if the receiver refrains from moving, they gain an inordinate amount of time to strategize their next move, drastically slowing down the game.

“It was smart by Dupont and everyone is copying it now, but it is an area that they (authorities) will have to change”, Bernard Jackman told RTE’s Against the Head earlier this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Ireland fullback Rob Kearney also took umbrage at the exploitation of the law. “It’s a law that is not showing the game in it’s best light and something needs to be changed,” said Kearney on Virgin Media Sports.

RugbyPass analyst Sam Larner wrote on X that: “I suspect this might be the game that kills the 5m Dupont law…. Scotland just being smart with it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The standstill at Murrayfield, perceived by many as poor viewing for spectators, will no doubt prompt calls for World Rugby to reconsider and possibly revise the rule to prevent such exploitation.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
C
CO 314 days ago

The RWC final became boring with the TMO’s taking over. A kick fest just another example of rugby needing to reward tries with a lot more points. The team that scores the most tries should win 99 percent of matches.

B
Bob Marler 314 days ago

What would make this conversation more interesting would be some mention of what the change in law/s should be.

Lots of complaining. Not a lot of thinking.

c
carlos 314 days ago

Dumb lex, sed lex est.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search