Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Black Ferns credit Canada's growth, lament poor discipline in loss

Katelyn Vaha'akolo of New Zealand is tackled by Fancy Bermudez of Canada. Photo by Sanka Vidanagama/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Canada took out the Pacific Four Series crown over the weekend in Christchurch with an historic 22-19 win over the Black Ferns.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was Canada’s first-ever win over the New Zealand side, adding to what was a momentous day for Canadian rugby.

In a game where Canada made just shy of 250 tackles compared to New Zealand’s 101, the visitors completed just shy of 90 per cent of their tackle attempts, executing an aggressive defensive line throughout a stoic 80-minute performance.

Having gone up 24-0 in the opening 10 minutes of their game against the USA, the Black Ferns again came out of the gates with intent in Christchurch, but the 14-3 lead they had built by the 22nd minute against Canada wasn’t enough.

The Canadians weathered the New Zealand storm and used their rolling maul to great effect, coming from behind to claim a lead early in the second half that they would never relinquish.

“We can always improve. That’s where our focus was and that was the message at the end of the game,” Black Ferns captain Ruahei Demant said following the loss.

“I think it’s exciting to know that whatever opposition you play, you can’t take lightly. The journey for us to the World Cup next year isn’t always going to be smooth, but I think this is where we get the most growth.

“We’re looking to expand and grow in many areas of our game and we know that isn’t always going to go perfectly, but that’s where we’re going to get the most growth.”

Related

Black Ferns coach Allan Bunting said there were some simple lessons to be learnt from the contest and gave his team’s opposition their flowers for the win.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Canada have grown their game, and they came out and have made some changes, they’ve got a kicking game that worked really well for them.”

New Zealand’s ambitious attacking game struggled in last year’s inaugural WXV 1 competition after another unbeaten run through the Pacific Four Series and of course, 2022’s Rugby World Cup win.

Aggressive defensive lines from the likes of France and England unravelled the reigning world champs’ potent attack, leading to a fourth-placed finish below both of their fellow Pacific Four Series foes in the top international division.

“It was frustrating at times, and obviously we’re disappointed as a whole group. It’s on all of us,” Bunting added.

“Canada, they did bring it to us… They were physical and held on to the ball and they certainly played in the right areas of the field. Our discipline let them down there quite a bit, so we’ll take some lessons from that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
B
Brian 205 days ago

WXV1 will have some interesting matches, I expect that each of the European Nations will play each of the Pac 4 countries. Ireland and USA will struggle but it should be a good match between them. Will the 7s players be back playing? England should be clear winners but France are often not good travellers and with it being in Canada they might slip up again but they will certainly be up for the BFs who have played almost all of their matches over the last two years at home, with mixed results and two of the wins were fortuitous against better sides.

WXV2 will have some very competitive matches, assuming the 6N teams will be playing Japan, SA and Australia. Will be very interesting to see how Australia fare. They also have a game arranged beforehand with Ireland, I would expect 6N teams to beat Japan and SA but nothing is a given and teams are improving quickly.

C
Courtney 211 days ago

To be honest this result was not that seismic as shock, Canada are a very good team and very few teams fear the Black Ferns anymore. The rankings give a good picture, the top four ranked teams are the top four teams in women’s rugby with England ahead the other three can exchange places at any given time. Despite the USA result I still think Australia are ahead of the rest. WXV will show how big the gap is between nations.

B
Brian 211 days ago

I’ve little doubt that England is comfortably the No 1 team and not only beat other teams but beat them easily. Not so sure about France. They should be No 2 after winning 3 of last 4 matches against NZ and only a straightforward missed kick prevented it from being 4 out of 4. However, then they inexplicably lost to Canada and Wallaroos in WXV. I thought the NZ match was their “cup final” and they took the others lightly, but they were not particularly impressive in 6N except in flashes. I think they have stood still whilst Canada and England have moved forward but I don't think Canada has the depth and their team is ageing. I agree NZ not moving forward. What will be interesting is how the Wallaroos fare against NZ and then again in their September match against Ireland and then in WXV2 against other 6N teams. I was surprised they lost to USA.

A
Andrew 211 days ago

NZ is now entrenched in Div 2 of womens rugby. Canada would be thrashed by the likes of France or England. Europe are Div 1, with massive competitions, massive money…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 40 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

39 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search