Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Black Ferns’ ‘point of difference’ explained after big win over Wallaroos

Katelyn Vahaakolo of the Black Ferns celebrates with team mates after scoring a try during the International Test Match between Australia Wallaroos and New Zealand Black Ferns at Ballymore Stadium on July 14, 2024 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

Director of Rugby Allan Bunting has explained what the Black Ferns’ “point of difference” is following the team’s relentless 62-nil win over neighbouring nation Australia on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

50 days on from their 67-19 demolition of the Wallaroos at Auckland’s North Harbour Stadium, the women in black prepared for the reverse Laurie O’Reilly Cup fixture after making the trip across the Tasman.

The Black Ferns laid down the challenge with their haka on the sacred turf of Brisbane’s Ballymore Stadium before the Test got underway. It was a relatively tight start to the match but then the floodgates opened midway through the first-half.

Winger Katelyn Vaha’akolo scored the first of what would be four tries that afternoon as the visitors piled on almost 30 points before the break. It was one-way traffic in the second period, starting with Vaha’akolo’s third try about 90 seconds into the second half.

Australia fought valiantly in defeat but it soon became apparent it would be a matter of ‘how much’ New Zealand won by. It was a masterful, five-star performance defined by solid work up front and slick skills in the backline.

“We’re proud of our ladies. They’ve really stepped up and taken some ownership of where (they) want to go and really connected everyone in on how we want to play. It’s really pleasing to se quite a bit of that coming out on the field today,” Allan Bunting told reporters.

“Our intent to play how we want to play, the work was amazing out there today. Some of the stuff we’ve been working on, we did get a little bit loose but some of the leadership out there to reign that back in, and we’re working really hard on our skills.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Just the intent to play and courage to play the game that was within us, that excites me and that’s our point of difference. We can get a little bit better at that, we will as time moves on.”

The Black Ferns’ two wins over the Wallaroos in the space of about two months has seen them put the shock of a first-ever loss to Canada behind them. That defeat during World Rugby’s Pacific Four Series is the only blip on an otherwise winning start to the year.

Related

But with next year’s Rugby World Cup in England rapidly approaching, the Black Ferns’ next Test is probably their most important. The Kiwis will take on England’s Red Roses at the home of rugby, Twickenham, on September 14.

That match pits the two Rugby World Cup finalists from the last tournament against one another. But a couple of years on, the runners-up England will carry the favourites tag into the clash with the world champion New Zealanders.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is important to see what we’re doing is moving in the right direction,” Bunting explained when asked about the importance of momentum.

“We’re going to Twickenham in a few months’ time and we’re really excited about that. That’ll be the next challenge.

“But the way the ladies are going at the moment, they’re really excited about how we’re playing. That’s where we focus for now and obviously, World Cup… after that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
SadersMan 159 days ago

Get real. The only point of difference required to beat the Wallaroos is to turn up with one sock down. England, Canada, & France, are a different kettle of fish. Nothing gets done unless it’s firstly done by the pack.

We have yet to see a settled, balanced, front row, a proper big athletic body at lock (a la Chelsea Bremner), a proper big athletic body at 6 (a la Alana Bremner) & our young halfs under proper stress. We’ll get embarrassed at Twickers if we don’t balance the pack.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search