Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bledis-low blow: The 'dirty' tactic Wallabies got away with on All Blacks star Richie Mo'unga

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Plenty has been made of the refereeing blunders that hurt the Wallabies’ chance to steal a famous victory over the All Blacks in Wellington. As with any test, though, there are always tit-for-tat decisions missed for various reasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sure, Australian touch judge Angus Gardner should have spotted Rieko Ioane’s foot on the line in the lead-up to Jordie Barrett’s opening try. And, yes, rookie All Blacks lock Tupou Vaa’i clearly came in from the side of the ruck which led to the crucial turnover while the Wallabies were metres out from the line in the closing stages.

Both instances could have swung the result – so, too, Ioane dropping the ball over the line.

Perceptions weren’t helped by the presence of non-neutral officials for the first time in 40 years for a Bledisloe test, with New Zealand referee Paul Williams taking charge after he spent time in camp with the All Blacks in Hamilton two weeks ago.

Video Spacer

Sam Smith gets fan reactions after All Blacks v Wallabies drawn test

Video Spacer

Sam Smith gets fan reactions after All Blacks v Wallabies drawn test

In reviewing the test, however, it’s also impossible to overlook several clear late hits that Richie Mo’unga copped from Wallabies defenders, all of which went unpunished.

“Richie has a bruised shoulder after being smacked about four times after he passed it. Apart from that, pretty good,” All Blacks coach Ian Foster said of the state of his squad the morning after their 16-all draw.

Pressed on whether those incidents should have been reviewed by match officials, Foster said: “He’s just got a sore shoulder”.

Rookie Wallabies blindside Harry Wilson, in particular, was fortunate not to be penalised, at the least, for his late hit that left Mo’unga prone on the pitch in the first half.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I passed the ball and next thing my stomach was in my chest,” Mo’unga said. “I was winded. He got me really good.”

On another occasion, after Mo’unga gave the pass for Ioane’s botched try just before half time, Filipo Daugunu came off his wing and hit the Crusaders playmaker with no arms.

All first five-eighths are accustomed to being targeted and pressured but it would not surprise to see officials for the second Bledisloe at Eden Park this week scrutinise the timing of tackles.

“That’s part of it. It happens a lot, and it’s up to the refs to decide if they want to have a look or anything,” Mo’unga, clearly reluctant to complain, added.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s out of my control. You just have to pass and try get out of the way before you see one coming.”

Foster expects Beauden Barrett to return from his minor Achilles complaint that forced him to withdraw two days before the opening Bledisloe but would not yet confirm whether he would slot straight into the fullback role for Damian McKenzie.

The only other concern for the All Blacks is the imminent arrival of Ardie Savea’s second child. Savea relocated to Auckland with the squad on Monday but naturally wants to be present for the birth.

“Not at the moment, no, but I’m not very good at predicting babies,” Foster said of Savea’s availability this week.

“That’s one of the little variables that are playing away in the background but it’s not impacting on our planning for Ardie to be available at the moment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 6 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search