Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bledisloe II: Australia player ratings vs New Zealand

Wallabies players look dejected after losing the Bledisloe Cup match between the New Zealand All Blacks and the Australian Wallabies at Eden Park on October 18, 2020 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Dave Rennie’s Wallabies were handsomely defeated 27-7 this afternoon at Eden Park, Auckland by a disciplined All Black outfit who revelled in the mistake-riddled Wallaby performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies showed glimpses of brilliance in otherwise what was a forgettable, performance. Too many handling errors, missed tackles and poor option taking ensured that both sides will travel to Australia with the New Zealanders taking a 1-0 lead in the best of 4 Bledisloe series.

The Wallabies will return to Australia knowing that the selections and tactics made for this test match will not suffice if the Australians are any realistic chance of winning in Sydney and Brisbane. The men in gold looked to play wide, but were well wide of the pass mark.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

How did the defeated Wallabies rate this afternoon?

https://www.instagram.com/p/CGeNjQlgc21/

15. Tom Banks – 5/10 – Had his moments defusing high balls and jinking around in space but what the Wallabies required was a hard-running full back who was willing to hit the line at pace and into to contact if required. It appeared Banks was waiting for the time and space to launch a raid as he does at provincial level, yet those opportunities don’t always arise at test level. His position in the side must be questioned.

14. Filipo Daugunu – 6.5 / 10 – Average day in defence but still showed what an attacking threat he can be with the limited opportunity he had in space. The Wallabies need to fashion an attack that allows him more space and front foot ball.

13. Hunter Paisami – 6/10 – Pushed passes, dropped ball coupled with some astute attacking lines and support play. Adapted admirably when Matt Toomua was forced from the field with injury but too often was simply on is own when taking on the line.

12. Matt To’omua – 7/10 – A far better performance this week being staunch in defence and a real threat in attack having a hand in Australia’s only try. The Wallabies lost their attacking shape when he left the field.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Marika Koroibete 3/10 – Dreadful. Despite scoring a try the usually dependable winger was dreadful. A club winger would have scored his try given the work done for him. He stifled the Wallabies attack through poor handling and an inability to get low and score when another try looked certain. I doubt he will ever play such a poor-a-test. Should apologise to the dressing room. Dreadful.

10. James O’Connor – 5.5/10 – Average performance and was singularly responsible for turning the pressure back onto the Wallabies at a critical moment of the game. His mid field kick, that remained chase-less, down the gullet of danger man Caleb Clarke who then went on to carve the Wallabies with an All Black try s short time thereafter was unforgivable for a player of his calibre and experience. Must be smarter.

9. Nic White – 6.5/10 – Was contained by the All Blacks yet he still caused them enough issues to confirm he remains the Wallabies best choice in the 9 jersey.

8. Harry Wilson – 6.5/10 – Was solid without being spectacular. He must learn not to push passes that are not on and look at times to be the pass option himself. The Wallabies were poorer for his absence when he left the field in the second half.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Michael Hooper 7/10 – Australia’s best player. Again, in the thick of it, securing the ball or linking up as a support player. The big question is how as a leader could he not get the message through to his team to cut out the silly errors? Needs to take ownership there.

6. Ned Hanigan – 5.5/10 – Astonishing performance by the recalled Waratah back rower. Astonished a player can be so good and so poor in the same match! Topping the Wallabies tackle count, yet also topping the Wallabies penalty count. Astonishing! Didn’t cause the All Blacks any great concern at the lineout but had his moments yet for whatever good he did, it was balanced out by his errors. Not the answer at 6.

5. Matt Philip – 6/10 – Honest Matt. Bloke doesn’t know how not to have a go. Worth persisting with. Makes his tackles, knows his job and does it.

4.Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 5.5/10 – Wasn’t disgraced out there but was outmuscled in the key moments. Like his counterparts was often to singular in attack.

3. Taniela Tupou – 5.5/10 – Nearly scored an early try and went looking for work but had an absolute ‘Brain-Fart’ when the Wallabies had turnover ball, numbers outside and space to work with, the big fella put in a kick fitting of a 3rd grade prop who was looking for a rest. Simply poor option taking. Must eradicate such rubbish from his game.

2. Brandon Paenga-Amosa – 6/10 – Should retain his position as the lineout appeared better that last week and came perilously close to scoring a try in the second half but was done for a double-movement.

1. James Slipper. 6.5/10 – The Wallabies scrum is so much stronger his presence. Had a high involvement around the park despite missing 3 in defence, he was one of the better forwards out there for the Wallabies.

 

  1. Jordan Uelese – 5/10 – Was dominated at scrum time and didn’t really bring the impact the Wallabies were seeking from their finishers.
  2. Scott Sio 5/10 – 5/10 – Little to no impact. Not good enough today.
  3. Allan Alaalatoa – 6.5/10 – Was dependable in defence but set piece had its issues and his handling was questionable at times.
  4. Rob Simmons – 4/10 – May have played his last test. His performance was bereft of impact.
  5. Liam Wright 5/10 – Guilty of poor ball security but won a try saving turnover near the death. How the Wallabies use him in the future will be interesting as he is not a gain line runner yet a wonderful player over the ball and out wide.
  6. Jake Gordon – 5.5/10 – the Wallabies attack appeared slower and disjointed when he was on. Perhaps not his fault, but not much impact today.
  7. Jordan Petaia 5.5/10 – Had his moments when he came on for Matt Toomua but was guilty of poor ball security at times. Glad to see he got through the match uninjured.
  8. Reece Hodge. 5/10 – Was there and too his credit hit the gain line at pace with limited attacking opportunity. Could he be the Wallaby 15 moving forward?
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 6 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster takes giant stride towards immediate Racing 92 exit Stuart Lancaster takes giant stride towards immediate Racing 92 exit
Search