Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Bloody worried' - so-called Springboks' strength now labelled a major concern

Press Association

Prior to the British & Irish Lions series, the Springboks’ scrum had been billed as a major strength of the hosts and one where the touring Lions could potentially come undone.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much of the confidence stemmed from their performance against England in the Rugby World Cup final in 2019, where a Matt Proudfoot-coached Boks pack did a number on England at scrum time. A year and a half on and the South Africans continued to beat the same drum, some insisting that the strength and depth of their front row was unmatched internationally.

‘The Boks are going to annihilate this Lions front row’ said AP Cronje, a particularly vocal South African journalist on Twitter. “Kitshoff, Mbonambi and Malherbe will more than sweat the Lions. Nche, Marx and Nyakane off the bench will clean up what’s left. No international side, or Lions side, can match SA’s depth in the front row. None come close.”

Video Spacer

A video that will completely change the way you see rugby star Jason Robinson | RugbyPass

Video Spacer

A video that will completely change the way you see rugby star Jason Robinson | RugbyPass

Yet days out from the first Test and the tables appear to have turned – or at least the sentiment among South African pundits and fans. A stern Test against renowned scrummagers Georgia softened the cough of supporters and another lacklustre performance by tighthead Trevor Nyakane two weeks later against the Lions have added to those fears.

“I’m actually bloody worried about the Bok scrum,” scrum guru and former Southern Kings head coach Robbie Kempson noted in the Sunday Times of South Africa at the weekend. “We only have Frans Malherbe.”

Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber was forced to go to batt for Nyakane, after naming him at three for the first Test against the Lions on Saturday, with Malherbe named on the bench, much to the surprise of many fans.

“I am very comfortable with Trevor at tighthead. He has got a specific role that he has to fulfil and he knows what that is. We see our front row forwards as a unit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is a specific role that we want Ox to achieve for us and it is the same with Trevor and then we will bring on Kitsie and Frans Malherbe in the second half,” Nienaber added.

Yet many on social media remain unconvinced. “I really think the noise around Trevor Nyakane is warranted, however we need to give him his opportunity. I’m sure he is well aware of the consequences should he not make the necessary step-up on Saturday – his place in that starting and replacement jumper is on the line…”

“Wyn Jones must be keen to face Nyakane again. Good chance for Nyakane to prove he’s still got it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I share Kempson’s concerns… Malherbe has had no game time; Nyakane hasn’t been at the level he was in 2019; Koch + Oosthuizen looked shaky. I’m utterly perplexed why the best scrummaging tighthead in the Premiership – Wilco Louw – wasn’t in the squad,” wrote Cronje, who appears to have come full circle in his take on the Bok front row.

Even if the idea is to launch Steven Kitshoff and Malherbe from the bench, South African fans will be left sweating their set-piece until Saturday evening, when their fears will either materialise or be banished against the Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search