Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Boks could yet be stripped of South Africa flag

Siya Kolisi of South Africa sings their national anthem

South Africa plans to appeal the proposed ‘ban’ by the World Anti-Doping Agency that could come into effect on October 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

Weekend media reports were the first hints that there was trouble brewing, with a midweek report on the Daily Maverick website pointing out exactly how it could potentially impact the Springboks’ campaign as they defend their World Cup title in France.

It was reported – as was first published on the WADA website last Thursday, September 28 – that the Boks may be forced to compete under a neutral flag in the quarterfinals of the World Cup.

They could also be denied singing their national anthem before matches, due to the country’s ‘non-compliance’ of the latest WADA regulations.

It all stems from a WADA meeting on September 22 – which made it clear that the South African National Anti-Doping Organizations (SAIDS) were ‘not compliant’ with WADA regulations, as a result of the South African government’s failure to amend its outdated drug-free sports act.

Related

South Africa has until October 13, the day before the World Cup quarterfinals, to comply.

However, Zizi Kodwa, the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture, said they plan to appeal the WADA ruling.

“The declaration of WADA has no effect till October 13,” Minister Kodwa said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“However, when we lodge the appeal, it will suspend the consequences,” he said, adding that he is “positive” the matter will be resolved speedily.

The appeal means the WADA stance will have no impact on the Boks’ campaign in France.

The South African Rugby Union was also reliant on government action to ameliorate the potential conundrum.

“The matter is totally out of our hands,” SARU CEO Rian Oberholzer told @rugby365com.

Related

“It is a pity it has happened, but it is an issue for government to resolve.

“We hope the matter gets resolved before the quarterfinals.”

Last month WADA announced in a statement that South Africa had fallen foul of the ‘mandatory compliance’ requirements and will face dire consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new revised anti-doping code from WADA came into effect on 1 January 2021 and all member countries must comply.

South Africa and Bermuda are the only two sporting bodies and federations out of 700 that are not compliant with the new code.

A statement by the Sports Minister, Kodwa, on the official government website already alerted to the potential problem.

“I have noted the decision by the WADA on Friday, September 23, that current South African legislation, the South African Drug-Free Sport Amendment Act, 25 of 2006, is not compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code,” Kodwa’s statement read.

“We have worked tirelessly to amend legislation as recommended by WADA.

“There has also been input by WADA in working with us to draft SAIDS’ Amendment Bill, which will now be taken through the South African Constitutional process of finalising a Bill.

“It is disappointing that South Africa has been found to be non-compliant despite this undertaking to pass legislation which meets the World Anti-Doping Code.

“I would like to reassure athletes, sports federations, and the sports public that the non-compliance finding will not affect drug testing in South African sport. SAIDS will continue to deliver services that protect clean sport in South Africa

“The South African Government process for promulgating legislation is thorough and comprehensive. Any legislation, including amendments, must meet the muster of the South African Constitution and cannot contradict or nullify any existing laws.

“I officially communicated with WADA President Witold Ban?ka on South Africa’s position, and have requested to meet with him urgently.

“South Africa is committed to anti-doping in sport. SAIDS has done much work to meet the evolving dynamics of compliance in global sport on matters of anti-doping, anti-corruption, governance reforms, child safeguarding and data protection.

“The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture will continue to expend all efforts get the Amendment Bill adopted expeditiously.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
B
BK 405 days ago

zizi do what you need to do, and stop trying to be clever,,,,this ANC Thing….always knows better

k
knob 407 days ago

WR doing their utmost to derail and hold SA back, and force British teams into the finals. You can bet their fingers are deep in this pie,like all the others.

There is a reason WR is headed up by an english white knight!
Where is BLM when it matters ?

Rassies “punishment” for exposing NicB’s anti-SA bias was held back months … until the eve of SA leaving to play England… then suddenly he got banned. Max disruption.

Has that same NicB been selected to ref IRE / Scot ?

That said, probably not even he could make the result that obvious! Could he?
So why then?… maybe to calm the waters and show he’s actually a “friend” of SA … until he gets selected as an official in a SA playoff! … u read it here first!

P
PM 407 days ago

This is just Another Distraction to make Sure the Boks and Rassie don’t win again. Why bring this up in the middle of a Competition…?
SA Protagonists will stoop to any Depth to Derail their Progress.
If it ain’t corrupted Refs and TV coverage, then it’s Rugby HQ….?

F
Frank 407 days ago

WTF cares? Pathetic of World Rugby to take this route. Just like spoiled little rich boys. Why punish the team instead of the government? So sick and tired of World Rugby forever finding negativity about the Springboks but wait you guys there is a shitstorm brewery

R
Reuben 407 days ago

Lol we all know the state of doping in SA rugby… Awhie: “SARMS accidentally made their way into my water bottle”

Bull shit. It's state sponsored.

P
Paul 408 days ago

This will only encourage the Boks to play harder.

S
Snash 408 days ago

*sits waiting for somebody to make allegations of rampant PEDs*

e
etienne 408 days ago

So sick and tired of the South African government, everything they touch turns to shit. They had ages to comply, but no they would rather bleed the country dry than do their actual jobs. Fucking bunch of useless idiots

C
Chris 408 days ago

We already got stripped of our electricity and safety ⚡️ what’s next…

m
michael 409 days ago

The Boks love external noise, beware the doubters, it only serves as motivation

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

7 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland player ratings vs Argentina | 2024 Autumn Nations Series Ireland player ratings vs Argentina | 2024 Autumn Nations Series
Search