Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Boring, diabolical... dreary old nonsense' - Haskell's four minute rant on tired rugby coverage

James Haskell

Former England star James Haskell has heavily criticised rugby’s ‘diabolical’ and out of date coverage in a four-minute online rant.

ADVERTISEMENT

The backrow turned MMA fighter hopes the sport can take an opportunity to re-evaluate how it presents its ‘product’ with the current suspension of the all professional rugby the world over due to the coronavirus.

WATCH: England and Sale flanker, Tom Curry took on Dragons’ Huw Taylor in the first round of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros tournament.

Video Spacer

Haskell was speaking on The House of Rugby Podcast with Alex Payne and fellow ex-England player Mike Tindall.

“My concerns with rugby and the professional game are that people involved in rugby think rugby is everything and that everyone cares about rugby,” said Haskell. “They think everyone knows about it and they just don’t.”

“Outside in the real world you suddenly realise if you ever get out of that bubble that people don’t care and that it’s a third or fourth tier sport. It’s never going to compete with football.

“It’s not even in the same league, competition. If football is at the top of the ladder, then rugby can’t even see the bottom rung.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So I think the whole game has to be centred around being accessible, and I think the TV commentary stuff, it’s just diabolical, boring.

“Nobody watches BT Sport. I don’t know how many viewers they get for that Rugby Tonight or whatever. No disrespect to them. It’s (Rugby Tonight) has got an amazing plethora of reporters and skillful people, legends of the game, but nobody watches BT Sport.

“Unless they do it because they are going to watch the Premiership. How many tune in to Rugby Tonight? I don’t know.

“I watched the coverage of the Six Nations. There are boys who are still involved who are great at what they did. It’s just there’s a younger generation with a short attention span – you need to be punchy and interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You have to be competitive in a competitive marketplace. You have to create a product that is fun to watch, easily understandable, [have] education around it, you need to do more at club rugby, get kids to play it at schools. You have to be ruthless.

Haskell rugby
James Haskell in 2015

“More teams doesn’t necessarily make for better rugby, a better product. Having played in all those leagues, I think stadiums and teams could do so much better match day experiences, to encourage people to come in to fill stadiums and create atmospheres, and create days out. That’s what people want.

“What thing about rugby over every other sport was the accessibility that the fans had to the players. You go to a Premiership football match and you’re lucky to get spat on by a Premiership player.

“You go to a rugby game and there are opportunities to meet players, [get] autographs signed, have that interaction. It’s important so that fans can feel part of the journey.

“You never want to lose any teams but I think this is an opportunity for the world at large to look at the way we travel, look at the way we treat people, look at our healthcare, our general hygiene, and team sport, look how we set teams up. Look how we do the business models and see if we can do something better this time round.

“Instead of tinkering around with silly rules, it should try and deliver a product and it should try not to be so paranoid about the content they put out and the creation. Other sports are doing it better than rugby.

“When you tune in to an international game, you want someone engaging, someone upbeat, someone informed.

“You don’t want dreary old nonsense. Sorry to say but that’s what my experience of watching the last few years has been.

“They’re never going to sign me up as I’m too controversial, so that doesn’t bother me.

“For example, I thought Dylan Hartley on the BBC when he came on against France was fantastic. Current, informed, interesting, opinionated, countered, knew exactly what was going on in the mental mindset.

“Anyone who hasn’t been around a changing room for the last five years, you’re just watching like everyone else.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 9 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search