Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Borthwick denies Leicester tackle issues a result of poor training

Leicester Tigrers head coach Steve Borthwick /PA

Steve Borthwick, the Leicester Tigers head coach, insists his squad are being coached to try and avoid dangerous head contacts and is adamant he does not want the introduction of a 20 minute red card despite losing two players in successive Heineken Champions Cup matches against Clermont Auvergne.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 20 minute red card idea is being trialled by Super Rugby and considered for wider introduction by World Rugby and would mean a player who is sent off can be replaced 20 minutes later by a substitute.

Borthwick’s view is particularly relevant as Guy Porter, in the first game in France, and Ollie Chessum on Saturday were dismissed for making contact with an opponent’s head in the two victories that put Leicester into a Cup quarter final at home to Leinster.

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

The latest European matches saw a blizzard for red and yellow cards and the issue is going to remain a major talking point for the rest of the season. However, Borthwick has made his stance very clear saying: “My view is a red card is a red card. That’s the way I was always brought up. If someone was given a red card they were off the pitch and did not return.

“That’s been my stance. Generally now with the ability of the TMO to review the footage, to go through a process, there shouldn’t be too many things mixed or too many mistakes made. There are clear protocols set out, therefore if somebody does something that warrants a red card, a sending off, then that should be for the game.”

Borthwick is adamant Leicester are working hard in training to lower the height of the tackler in a bid to avoid more red cards but accepts it may take time for it to become second nature.

He added: “We work each week on our tackle height. We work on practicing that as much as we can without doing more tackling than we already do. We measure our contact in training. You always find different ways to do it and we have still had a couple of incidents. One wasn’t a tackle. It was still a head collision that led to a red card. We are working hard at it and I am sure every other club is working hard at it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to make sure we have got good habits in every player who enters the system. The most important thing in this area is that we are coaching all the young players right from the outset the height with which they need to tackle. That will take time to filter through but by ingraining good habits at a young age as quickly as we can so that if we get the right habits at a young age then it will filter through. I am an advocate of coach development and helping coaches as much as we can and investing in coaching to help young players.

Related

“We have players who have been playing rugby an awful long time. We are trying to change their habits that are ingrained. We are working hard to lower the tackle height.

“I think rugby has made some substantial changes and has been pretty clear on the protocols that need to be followed. I think that the sanctions around tackle height are pretty steep. By the nature of the red cards, I think people can see this issue taken pretty seriously. So I’d say rugby is taking a pretty progressive stance in getting on to it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search