Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Borthwick has to ditch the Smith/Farrell axis - Andy Goode

When will the Owen Farrell Marcus Smith experiment be shelved? (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results and Steve Borthwick has to ditch the Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell combination this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones hung his hat on the axis in the latter part of his reign but they’ve won just four of the nine Tests they’ve started alongside one another, most of which have been at Twickenham, and there just aren’t enough signs that suggest it can work.

In fact, it’s the exact opposite and, while there are always going to be flashes of quality, there are far more examples of one or other looking completely lost and I’m not sure how anybody can make the case that they dovetail well.

Video Spacer

England fans slam atmosphere at Twickenham after loss to Scotland | Six Nations 2023

Video Spacer

England fans slam atmosphere at Twickenham after loss to Scotland | Six Nations 2023

Ironically, the best bit of play England produced in attack for Max Malins’ second try didn’t involve either Smith or Farrell and we need to be seeing so much more from them because there’s no doubt in my mind that Kevin Sinfield’s job as defence coach is harder with them both there.

Owen Farrell
Owen Farrell the England captain looks dejected after their defeatduring the Six Nations Rugby match between England and Scotland at Twickenham Stadium on February 04, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Farrell was at fault for the first try when he flew out of the line to try to get Finn Russell, who wasn’t his man, and then he and Joe Marchant just stood there after the initial kick chase for Duhan van der Merwe’s wonder try.

This isn’t a criticism of Farrell’s defence, though, because we all know he can defend but he just isn’t comfortable with the role and it’s as clear as day to me that Farrell is not a number 12 with the way the game is being played at the moment.

ADVERTISEMENT

He’s a fly half, that’s where he plays for his club and that’s where he should play for his country. Of course, he is capable of playing centre but I don’t think he’s had a really top drawer game in the position in this World Cup cycle.

Farrell is never going to say it publicly but I would hope he’s having honest conversations with the coaches behind the scenes and telling them he believes he should have the number 10 on his back.

He would be so much more comfortable there, there’s no doubt he wants to play there and if he’s the character that we all think he is, then I don’t see any issue with him challenging the coaches and I’d expect him to be doing so as long as it’s in the right manner.

It’s not that it can never work playing two fly halves together, and it did work a bit better with George Ford and Farrell for a while because of the relationship they’ve had from an early age and because Ford is happy for Farrell to take the lead.

ADVERTISEMENT
George Ford Owen Farrell
George Ford and Owen Farrell /PA

However, France tried it and scrapped it pretty quickly with Matthieu Jalibert and Romain Ntamack recently and it’s just so difficult with the personalities that these players often are and the fact they’re used to being the fulcrum at their clubs and then end up playing a bit part at times during games.

You see it a lot with Smith where he wants to be taking the lead but Farrell has stepped in and he’s never really stood in the 12 channel before and there are endless examples of him or Farrell looking uncomfortable in phase attack, whereas Russell was martialling his troops around the field and looking happy going through his options.

It might not have been at the same level but I had it with Sam Vesty at Leicester a little bit and Joe Carlisle at Worcester and it just didn’t work. We were both playing as a fly half and you need the clarity of one person leading from that position.

Clarity was one of the watchwords for the England coaching staff in the build-up to the game against Scotland and Borthwick has spoken a lot about playing to players’ strengths so I think he has to back those words up with actions this week.

There is no way that this is playing to either Smith or Farrell’s strengths and, while there are injuries with the likes of Dan Kelly and Henry Slade out, there are natural options at centre ready and raring to go.

Lawrence Worcester <a href=
Bath debut” width=”1024″ height=”576″ /> (Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

I’d go with Ollie Lawrence because he was on the bench on Saturday so is the next cab off the rank, and only got four minutes to prove himself at the end, and bring Manu Tuilagi back in among the replacements.

England had 57% of the possession and an enormous 71% territory but they had just 2 linebreaks. They did score three tries but from 11 visits to the opposition 22 and it was like they were attacking with 14 a lot of the time because one of Smith or Farrell looked so lost.

As well as there being greater clarity in attack, it’d have a massive impact on England’s defence and Sinfield’s job this week to have a natural centre wearing number 12.

You can’t say it cost England the game but it had a major impact on a couple of the tries conceded and people can say that it’s just a case of defending one position out but Farrell doesn’t do that week in, week out and it makes a huge difference.

Watching what Italy did to France on Sunday, England can’t afford to persist with an experiment that so far just hasn’t borne fruit and they just haven’t worked in tandem thus far.

Farrell looked good at times when he was at first receiver and he is the most in-form of the two players, while Borthwick has also boxed himself into a corner to some extent by naming him captain, so the Saracens man should be the one to get the nod at fly half.

They say a cat has nine lives and Smith and Farrell have used up their nine lives together at international level for me, giving them a 10th Test in unison and expecting dramatically different results going forwards would be the definition of madness.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
R
Robert 653 days ago

Slade is available.

W
Wes 653 days ago

If you look at the results, England is playing about 500 ball with Smith at 10. Is that really going to get it done at the World Cup in September?

S
Shaun 653 days ago

Correct, drop Smith

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search