Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Both players going a million miles an hour': Why Rieko Ioane's no try was an 'utter farce' of a decision

(Photo by Greg Bowker/Getty Images)

Fans have taken to Twitter to take aim at what has been described as an “utter farce” of a decision to not award Blues centre Rieko Ioane a try due to a dubious forward pass call made by his brother Akira during their side’s win over the Highlanders on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The movement started from a turnover near their own goal line, where the Blues decided to counter-attack from in front of their goal posts. Second-five Harry Plummer found Akira on the edge and the older brother put the foot down.

Jostling with Highlanders’ first-five Josh Ioane, Akira broke through the high tackle to burst away down the sideline. Around the halfway mark, with Highlanders defenders surrounding him on all sides, the No 6 fired a wild long pass in field where Rieko was there to haul it in.

Video Spacer

Richie McCaw continues to push the limits

Video Spacer

Richie McCaw continues to push the limits

In open field, the midfielder veered left and used his speed to burn away from the cover tackle of wing Ngane Punivai to ignite the Eden Park crowd.

The try was a breathtaking play that would have put the Blues up 22-7 after having already scored two well-worked tries, of which Rieko had set up.

A deflating TMO decision to disallow the try left many pundits unhappy, though, as it was ruled that Akira’s pass at the halfway mark had travelled forward.

The ball had been released from Akira’s grasp at the halfway line and looked to go backwards out of his hands, but Rieko ended up catching the ball at the Highlanders’ 10 metre mark.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many were aggrieved by the decision, including Irish journalist Andy McGeady, who highlighted that the momentum of players moving can take a pass forward even if the ball has been released backwards out of the hands.

In instances like Ioane’s, he believed the try should have stood and the decision to disallow it was “depressing” for the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand journalist Liam Napier also doubted the merits of the not try decision, highlighting that the same TMO Paul Williams made the error in awarding Leicester Fainga’anuku’s try the night before in Christchurch despite a foot that grazed the grass outside the field of play.

World Rugby’s Laws have a simplistic outlook on what determines a forward pass, as Law 11.6 states: “A throw forward may occur anywhere in the playing area”.

Law 11.7, the only other law regarding forward passes, states: “A player must not intentionally throw or pass the ball forward.”

A lack of definitive clarification on what determines a forward pass could be attributed to why Ioane’s forward pass was called and why many onlookers disagree with Williams’ call.

While there is no law that suggests that the ball being released backwards from the hands should override a forward pass call, World Rugby – formerly the IRB – themselves debunked the debate in 2011 in a video posted to their YouTube channel.

The video shows how passes that would normally look fine to the naked eye technically travel forward in relation to the ground, but shouldn’t be called a forward pass as the the ball forward because of the momentum of an attacking player.

In the video, the narrator outlines that “the referee must judge a forward pass purely on the passing action of the passer and not be influenced by the movement of the ball relative to the ground.”

Many have argued that reasoning should have been applied to Akira’s pass. Although the decision to rule out the try didn’t cost the Blues in the end, who ran away 39-17 winners, it did rob fans and spectators of the moment for Rieko.

However, the slew of questionable TMO calls over the weekend suggest fans could lose confidence in the standard of refereeing as the competition enters a round of pivotal match-ups which could be close games.

The Hurricanes host the Chiefs in a battle of the winless teams while the Blues host the Crusaders in a blockbuster at Eden Park.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

5 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search