Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bottom side Newcastle include Pumas duo while Bristol change five

(Photo by Gaspafotos/MB Media/Getty Images)

Los Pumas centres Matias Orlando and Matias Moroni have been named to start by Newcastle in Friday night’s Gallagher Premiership home game versus Bristol. Moroni, a try-scoring sub in round five of The Rugby Championship, was last week promoted from the Argentina bench by Michael Cheika to take over in Durban from club colleague Orlando in the Test midfield versus the Springboks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both centres will now start for the Falcons having arrived in England on Monday night and trained with Dave Walder’s team on Tuesday. For Moroni, his selection heralds a Newcastle debut after he joined the club following last season’s Premiership title victory with Leicester.

Newcastle will surely benefit from having The Rugby Championship duo in their team for a round four match they come into having lost their opening three games – including last Saturday’s disspirited hammering at crisis club Worcester who have since been suspended from the Premiership.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Walder said: “When players of that quality become available you have just got to pick them. They landed on Monday evening, they were training with the team on Tuesday and they have just slotted straight in.

“Matias Orlando is obviously familiar with a lot of what we do having been with us for a couple of seasons already, and even during their time away with Argentina I have been speaking to them both regularly and communicating around what we’re trying to do with the team here. It’s a big boost to have those guys available to us.”

Related

Table toppers Bristol make five changes to their XV for the trip to bottom side Newcastle, midfielder Jack Bates among the changes that also sees the first start this season at scrum-half for Andy Uren while Jake Woolmore deputises for the rested Ellis Genge at loosehead.

NEWCASTLE: 15. Tom Penny; 14. Adam Radwan, 13. Matias Moroni, 12. Matias Orlando, 11. Mateo Carreras; 10. Brett Connon, 9. Sam Stuart; 1. Adam Brocklebank, 2. George McGuigan, 3. Trevor Davison, 4. Greg Peterson, 5. Sean Robinson, 6. Will Welch (capt), 7. Connor Collett, 8. Callum Chick. Reps: 16. Charlie Maddison, 17. Logovi’i Mulipola, 18. Richard Palframan, 19. Sebastian de Chaves, 20. Jamie Blamire, 21. Josh Barton, 22. Tian Schoeman, 23. Pete Lucock.

ADVERTISEMENT

BRISTOL: 15. Rich Lane; 14. Luke Morahan, 13. Jack Bates, 12. Piers O’Conor, 11. Henry Purdy; 10. AJ MacGinty, 9. Andy Uren; 1. Jake Woolmore, 2. Will Capon, 3. Kyle Sinckler, 4. Ed Holmes, 5. Joe Joyce, 6. Chris Vui, 7. Jake Heenan (capt), 8. Magnus Bradbury. Reps: 16. Harry Thacker, 17. Yann Thomas, 18. Max Lahiff, 19. John Hawkins, 20. Dan Thomas, 21. Harry Randall, 22. Callum Sheedy, 23. Sam Bedlow.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search