Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bourgarit gets off lightly for 'deliberate, repeated and sustained pressure' to Curry's eye area

Pierre Bourgarit

La Rochelle hooker Pierre Bourgarit got off lightly for purposefully making contact with the eye area of Sale Sharks and England flanker Tom Curry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bourgarit has been suspended for just six weeks following an independent Disciplinary Hearing in London arising from his club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 2 match against Sale Sharks at the AJ Bell Stadium.

Bourgarit was sent off by the referee, Andrew Brace in the 38th minute of the match for making contact with the eye area of Curry in contravention of Law 9.12.

The top-end range was 12 to 52 weeks. Under World Rugby’s Sanctions for Foul Play, Law 9.12 relating to contact with the eye area carries at the Low End: 4 weeks and a mid-range of 8 weeks.

An independent Disciplinary Committee heard submissions and evidence from Bourgarit, who accepted the red card decision, from La Rochelle’s Legal Representative, Christian Chevalier, from the La Rochelle Rugby Administrator, Robert Mohr, and from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

The Committee upheld the red card decision finding that the act of foul play was deliberate and repeated with sustained pressure to Curry’s eye area.

It was decided that the offence was at the top end of World Rugby’s sanctions for contact with the eye area, however, it was also decided that there was no reason to consider a sanction greater than the minimum entry point of 12 weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were no aggravating factors, and taking into account the player’s guilty plea, clear disciplinary record and timely expression of remorse, the Committee reduced the sanction by the maximum of 50% before imposing a six-week suspension.

Bourgarit is free to play on Monday, 6 January 2020, and both he and EPCR have the right to appeal the decision.

Video Spacer

Jacques du Plessis suspended for five weeks

Meanwhile Montpellier second row, Jacques du Plessis, has been suspended for five weeks following an independent Disciplinary Hearing arising from his club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 2 match against Gloucester Rugby at the GGL Stadium.

Du Plessis was sent off by the referee, George Clancy, in the 56th minute of the match for striking the Gloucester second row, Gerbrandt Grobler, with his arm in contravention of Law 9.12.

ADVERTISEMENT

An independent Disciplinary Committee heard submissions and evidence by video conference from Du Plessis, who accepted the red card decision, from the Montpellier Team Manager, Tom Whitford, and from the EPCR Disciplinary Officer, Liam McTiernan.

The Committee upheld the red card decision finding that Du Plessis had struck Grobler to the head with his arm in a reckless manner. As contact to the head carries a minimum mandatory mid-range sanction, according to World Rugby’s regulations, six weeks was selected as the appropriate entry point.

Due to the player’s prior disciplinary record, the Committee added one week to the sanction, but it also took into consideration his guilty plea and timely expression of remorse and then reduced the sanction by two weeks before imposing a five-week suspension.

Du Plessis is free to play on Monday, 30 December 2019, and both he and EPCR have the right to appeal the decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 13 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

39 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search