Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brad Shields is banned after contesting last Sunday's red card

(Photo by Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Wasps’ ability to field a competitive team for Sunday’s Heineken Champions Cup trip to Toulouse has been hit by the suspension of Brad Shields for four weeks. Shields was sent off in the 26th minute of last weekend’s 35-14 defeat by Munster after referee Romain Poite deemed his tackle on Dave Kilcoyne to be dangerous, saying that he had struck the prop’s neck with his shoulder.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former England back-rower contested the red card at an independent hearing but it was found that he had “made contact with Kilcoyne’s head and neck area in a dangerous manner”.

The offence was considered mid-range in severity, resulting in a six-week ban that was reduced by two weeks because of Shields’ good disciplinary record. It wipes out his involvement in the second round of Europe this weekend, plus Gallagher Premiership fixtures against London Irish, Sale and Leicester.

Video Spacer

Pablo Matera arrives at the Crusaders

Video Spacer

Pablo Matera arrives at the Crusaders

However, the last week of the suspension will be waived if he successfully completes a World Rugby coaching intervention, making it possible for him to face the Tigers at the CBS Arena on January 9.

It is a major blow to Wasps, who are struggling to raise a team for their visit to the Stade Ernest Wallon due to an injury list that accounts for 17 players and an outbreak of Covid. They have since announced they will be appealing the disciplinary hearing decision.

Shields is generally a very well disciplined player and it was last month on RugbyPass when he described his feelings about his first-ever career red card when he was sent off for two yellow cards for collapsed mauls in Wasps’ Premiership defeat to Bristol. 

His latest red card was ridiculed on this week’s episode of The Rugby Pod, show co-host Andy Goode hitting out at referee Poite for his decision. “He is what is known as a cowboy. He is French, he is an absolute cowboy of a referee, Romain Poite, with that decision to send off Brad Shields with a red card. It is never a red. It doesn’t even make contact with his head for me. Romain Poite, you get the bad this week.”  

ADVERTISEMENT

  

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
K
Kelvin 1100 days ago

A few rough decisions why didnt the Munster player get sited or bin for clearly going off his feet clearing out a wasp player who was legally contesting for the ball prior to Munster scoring ?

G
Gwynfryn 1101 days ago

This game is going completely mad. Someone gets sent off for an offence he, let’s face it, did not commit. He then has the audacity to state, in his defence, that he did not commit the offence for which he was sent off. The disciplinary panel metes out full punishment to those who protest their innocence. What is the point of anyone appearing before the panel at all? Why not assume that the player has accepted his guilt, punish him according to disciplinary protocols, then reduce the punishment by half because the player is assumed to have accepted his guilt.

K
Kevin 1102 days ago

Shield's red card and subsequent ban totally ridiculous. There was no intent and was what was once called a rugby collision. Searching the incident for every angle in slow motion is ridiculous and does not reflect the truth of the situation. Polite was awful in all aspects of the wasps munster game and totally destroyed the contest by the Red card and then a dubious yellow card on frost. He should have to recertificy as a referee before continuing.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search