Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Breeding farms' - Incensed Samoan PM the latest to launch broadside on World Rugby greed

England played Samoa in 2017

Samoa’s Prime Minister has attacked World Rugby’s plans to launch a Nations Championship insisting the proposed structure will mean the Pacific Islands nations will remain as merely “breeding farms” for larger rugby countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tuilaepa Sailele Malielegaoi, who is also chairman of Samoa Rugby, is no stranger to controversy and his comments come as World Rugby chiefs assemble in Dublin to discuss controversial plans for a 12 nation competition that is unlikely to feature Fiji, Tonga and Samoa in the top flight.

Tuilaepa told TVNZ it was clear World Rugby’s supposed development of tier two nations is nothing but hypocrisy and lip service.

“The inclusion of Italy and the United States, who are not in the top 12 world rankings, clearly points to greed and selfishness,” he said. “This new concept will treat Tier 2 unions as mere breeding farms for the rich 12 to pick and choose players from.”

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Tuilapa says he is disappointed with the “lackadaisical attitude” of the All Black and Wallabies management as island players have contributed so much to the development of their game and is calling for major changes, including the easing of eligibility rules, gate-sharing of takings and setting up a Tribunal by law to adjudicate on contentious issues.

World Rugby has insisted no firm decisions have yet been made about the proposed world league competition with tomorrow’s Dublin meeting involving representatives from all tier-one nations, along with Fiji, Japan. However, the concept is in danger of collapse with the Six Nations organisation, also based in Dublin, being offered more than £500m by CVC for a 30 percent stake in the annual tournament reducing the financial need to take part in World Rugby’s new competition.

World Rugby have responded to Tuilaepa’s comments by making it clear promotion and relegation is part of the Championship structure allowing Tier 2 nations to rise up the ladder.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Spew_81 59 minutes ago
Stat chat: Clear favourite emerges as Sam Cane's All Blacks successor

I chose Savea as he can do all the roles that an openside needs to do. e.g. he can do the link role, or the initiating run role. He does all the roles well enough, and the ones he’s not great at can be spread across the forwards. But the main reason is that the All Blacks need to break the opposition defenses up for the All Blacks offloading game to work (Savea can both break the line or exploit the break as a support player); he’s got the power running game to do that and the finesse to operate in the centers or on the edge. Also, he can captain the team if he needs to; and, a 6 foot 2 openside can be used as a sometimes option in the lineout, he’s got the leg spring for it.


In 2022 I thought Papali’i would be the way forward. But he’d never quite regained the form he had in the 2022 Super Rugby season.


I think that viewing a player, in isolation, isn’t a great way of doing it. Especially as a good loose forward trio hunts as a pack; and the entire forward pack and wider team work as part of a system.


Requirements for player capabilities are almost like ‘Moneyball’. They can either come from one or two players e.g. lineout throwing or goal kicking, or can be spread across the team e.g. running, offloading, tackling, cleaning out, and turnovers etc.


As stated I think the missing piece with the All Blacks is that they are not busting the line and breaking up the opposition’s highly organized defenses. For instance. If the Springboks forwards had to run 40m meters up and down the field regularly, as the All Blacks have broken the line, then they will get tired and gaps will appear. The Springboks are like powerlifters, very very strong. But if the pace of the game is high they will gas out. But their defense needs to be penetrated for that to happen.

23 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How Rassie Erasmus and the Springboks are winning rugby's secret information war How Rassie Erasmus and the Springboks are winning rugby's secret information war
Search