Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brendan Venter - Defensive analysis ahead of second test

Brendan Venter /Getty

It was not a perfect performance from the Springboks in the first Test of the series against England but it was a great start. The 10-try epic was more like a Super Rugby game than a Test match. The visitors scored their tries too easily but the home side registered some amazing five-pointers as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

The second Test in Bloemfontein on Saturday presents an intriguing challenge for the two defence coaches – Jacques Nienaber and Paul Gustard. The reason the first Test was so erratic was because the defences were quite poor on both sides. By poor, I mean that both teams gifted space and yards.

The main reason the Springboks struggled defensively was because a number of new players came together. The defensive system the Boks would have had in place for the first Test would have been, when in doubt, for the wings to play up and not to hang back. However, said strategy is entirely dependent on the rest of the team generating width. If there is no width and the wings stand up, they get caught out. That is exactly was transpired as England created numbers easily on the outside.

In turn, the English defensive deficiencies were exposed. It was a similar principle but for different reasons. Flyhalf George Ford is not a great defender and Henry Slade is not a natural NO 13, so he got too tight. Meanwhile, Mike Brown has not defended too often on the wing and fullback Elliot Daly didn’t close the gate early enough. Last week’s Man of the Match, Faf de Klerk, poses plenty of questions to the second defender and, if the visitors don’t find a way to close him down, the livewire Sales Sharks scrum-half will tighten up the tourists’ defence. However, Gustard, who will join up with Harlequins, is a quality defence coach and I foresee England getting better width in the second Test.

Joel Stansky joins The Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

In Bloemfontein, I expect the teams to drive more and the aerial contest may well take on greater relevance. England would be crazy not to aerially bombard South Africa’s two young wings. Aphiwe Dyantyi and S’bu Nkosi are very talented runners with ball in hand, and both can become superstars, but their fundamental weakness would be their defence, kicking game and receipt of the high balls.

It will be interesting to view how Eddie Jones adapts his approach for the second Test because much is said about his tactical awareness and how effective he is in that area. It will be instructive to see where England attack South Africa because the home team have weaknesses that can be exploited.

Jones has revealed his hand by only making two changes to his starting XV. With Joe Launchbury coming in, and Brad Shields replacing Chris Robshaw, England are expecting a stronger lineout threat from the home side. England were quite thin in the lineout and down on jumpers last weekend, while South Africa’s set-piece play was superb. Franco Mostert called the lineout well and Bongi Mbonambi’s throwing-in was exceptional. England’s backline remains unchanged. Jones may have missed a trick by not shifting Owen Farrell to flyhalf because England have enjoyed the bulk of their success when he has worn the NO 10 jersey. Farrell is a solid defender in the ten channel but Jones doesn’t change his mind easily. He clearly feels that the 10-12 axis is working on attack for England.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, Schalk Brits has been called up to the Springbok squad for the remainder of the series. He is in form at the moment and played great rugby for Saracens this season. However, personally speaking I don’t believe Rassie Erasmus brought Brits in to play. It’s rather to fulfil a mentorship role.

Mbonambi enjoyed a really good Test match and Akker van der Merwe is the future. Prior to Brits’ inclusion, Chiliboy Ralepelle was the third-choice hooker in the group, so I don’t know what the conversation with Chiliboy would have been. However, Schalk is the type of person that gets on with everyone and he won’t bring conflict to the group. The 37-year-old hooker’s experience will prove invaluable for the youngsters in the team but, when it comes down to talking tactics, I don’t foresee him giving away too much inside information about his former Saracens teammates. It’s not the way Schalk is, with the Saracens players in the England fold his friends, having spent 10 years at the club.

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 52 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

156 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search