Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brett Gosper retains one regret from long stint as World Rugby CEO

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Ex-World Rugby CEO Brett Gosper has revealed his one regret from his long stint in charge of the game’s governing body. The Australian was in charge from 2012 through to last year when he decided to change sports and become the NFL head of Europe and the UK.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unlike in NFL, where franchises seem to willingly buy into the greater good, politics was rife during Gosper’s time as rugby CEO and that fragmentation has continued since his departure with various countries protecting their self-interests rather than adopting a more inclusive perspective.  

Looking back on his eight years as World Rugby CEO, Gosper told The Telegraph he has one lingering regret. “If I have any regrets, and regret is probably the wrong word, what I would have liked to have seen is the Nations Championship.

Video Spacer

Ali Price guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Ali Price guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

      “We proposed it with access to all teams at the top table, making every international game count in a competition with different divisions and including teams like the USA.

      “Not doing that was a missed opportunity and it would have had the governing body at the centre of the most valuable part of the game. It wasn’t to be, and that was frustrating at the time.

      It remains Gosper’s belief that rugby will only prosper from a more unified approach to finance and revenue sharing. “Put it this way, if there is a growing gap between the haves and the have-nots, then it is not going to be great for the competitive nature of the sport and particularly the Rugby World Cup which drives revenues for the vast majority of countries across the world.

      “Some mechanism that ensures that divide does not increase and the teams remain competitive needs to be found in rugby.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “Rugby suffers a little bit from fragmented interests which can stop it moving forward at times. There are lessons for rugby, and other sports, about how the NFL is aligned for the benefit of all. It is an all for one and one for all organisation.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

      France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Lions Share | Episode 4

      Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

      USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      1 Comment
      i
      isaac 1313 days ago

      I hope the so called homes nations and the rugby Championship unions make changes sooner...or rugby league is growing everyday...many will say league is no way near union..ever wondered why soccer and cricket, basketball and others continue to dominate..rugby is stagnant...need old farts to think about growing competitiveness and thus will get recognition through financial injections not privatising individual unions who only think of their own pockets

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      N
      NH 56 minutes ago
      'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

      Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

      17 Go to comments
      J
      JW 1 hour ago
      Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

      Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


      Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


      No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


      So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


      The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

      68 Go to comments
      TRENDING
      TRENDING 'No regard for what anyone’s done in the past': Verdict on Pollock from inside Lions camp 'No regard for what anyone’s done in the past': Verdict on Pollock