Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brian Moore proposes England Women face age-grade male sides

Brian Moore has suggested the Red Roses could potentially train against age grade England men's sides.

Brian Moore has set social media alight by suggesting that the England Women’s team might consider playing age-grade men’s team in a ‘structured’ setting as preparation ahead of the Women’s Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

England hammered Scotland 57 – 5 in their opening game of the TikTok Women’s Six Nations, suggesting the perennial problem of a gulf in class between England and their opponents is yet to be bridged.

Moore is commenting at this year’s tournament after relinquishing the same role for the BBC’s broadcast of the men’s game.

Video Spacer

Chris Ashton | Rugby Roots

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Chris Ashton | Rugby Roots

      As it stands, the majority of the Red Roses side are contracted under professional contracts, and there is a considerable divide between them and all but France in the current Women’s Six Nations competition.

      Ireland, Scotland and Italy players – with a few exceptions – are either amateur or semi-professional, while Wales are a mixture of professional and amateur. France has been England’s closest rivals of late for the title, but it hasn’t stopped the Red Roses from winning 12 of the last 20 titles, including the last four tournaments.

      To bridge the gap ahead of facing New Zealand’s Black Ferns at the Rugby World Cup, Moore suggests that Red Roses could play against England age-grade men’s teams, even potentially the U20s, provided it was ‘structured’.

      “If the England women’s team cannot find the sort of physical and technical challenge that they need in ordinary fixtures against conventional opponents, they should look to see if it is possible to have structured training sessions and games against the England Under-18 or Under-20 male teams,” he wrote.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “Purists might baulk at this sort of crossover and in an ideal world, where every Tier 1 union valued and invested in women’s rugby, this would not be necessary. Until then, they might have to be creative.”

      “There is no reason, other than lack of will, for the Scottish, Irish and Italian Unions to fund a form of professional women’s game. It does not have to be the equal of that in England or New Zealand, but they can and must invest in this area.”

      It’s an interesting concept, not least given the size difference between the England women’s team and their male age grade colleagues.

      England’s Women’s heaviest player is Bryony Cleall, who stands 183cm tall and weighs in at 108kg. Cleall is an outlier, however, with most of England’s current forward pack weighing in between 85kg and 97kg.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      The England U20s on the other hand are effectively the same size and weight as a normal professional side – and in some cases even bigger. Many of the current England U20s forward pack top the scales at over 120kgs, while most of the backs are taller and heavier than the Red Roses’ forward pack.

      Leaving size aside, the differences in athletic performance and body composition could call into question the safety of such an exercise – even in a structured setting as Moore suggests.

      The former England hooker responded to criticism of the idea, saying he understood the ‘danger’. “I’m well aware of danger hence suggesting only structured training or games and then only if other unions refuse to fund their women’s pro game properly,” replied Moore to one skeptic.

      At present many unions do not allow male and female players to play contact rugby against each other, in any context.

      ADVERTISEMENT
      Play Video

      South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Lions Share | Episode 5

      Play Video

      Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

      Play Video

      Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

      Play Video

      The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

      Play Video

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      Play Video

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      2 Comments
      r
      ric 1218 days ago

      maybe play an u14s team?

      A
      Andrew 1218 days ago

      Not as silly as it sounds. NZs Silver Ferns play a series against NZs Mens Netball team some of whom are well over 2 m tall. In the late 90-s the Canterbury Womens Rugby side far and away the best in NZ at the time had a practice game against the Christchurch Club Champion Burnside U/15s boys (one of the womens sons played in this team.) as a prep for the season with Golden Oldies Scrums. The boys thrashed them 45-0 but the women all said it helped them up the intensity of their subsequent games.

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Long Reads

      Comments on RugbyPass

      M
      Mzilikazi 48 minutes ago
      'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

      I get where you are coming from,Om. And there was a case when that French under strength team came out to Australia. Cameron Woki picked at the base of a ruck and jumped/dived over. That would clearly now be penalised.


      But the Sheehan try is different to my eye. It starts from a tap penalty, he drives forward, the two WB defenders go low for a tackle in the assumption Sheehan will go to ground. He does not, but seeing the hole now left dives through it. In this case surely there is zero danger there.


      Both WB heads are well clear below. There would have been far more danger had Sheehan also dropped low, as he had done on one, or was it two occasions in the game.


      I just can’t see his movement as a jump. There is virtually no vertical element, it is say only 5% upwards. Surely at 95% horizontal, that won’t be penalised, not even seriously looked at ?


      “It is different to the sideline touchdown on the wing”. You are the only person in hundreds of posts I have read who brings that up. I have been thinking of that as well, but not commented till now prompted by you. And you are correct, it is in most cases very different, being a side on tackle, not head on. But still, it is often more a jump than a dive. I would not advocate for penalising…..some wonderful tries scored that way, and the danger element is generally not excessive, at least not for head injuries.

      27 Go to comments
      T
      TL 3 hours ago
      'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

      I agree, the comparison to Rassie in 2021 is unfair. Schmidt despite being highly emotional was scrupulous in not making it a personal grudge match, and in the circumstances I think he behaved in a decent way. What Rassie did was unhinged and extreme. Why fudge the two together? It’s much more common for coaches to do what Joe did, and it was unusual for him, he resisted efforts of journo’s to get him talking about the cards that weren’t in Test 1. He’s taken exception in this instance, if he was doing it all the time I’d dismiss it, but he’s got some cred so I take it a little more seriously when he speaks up.


      Otherwise Mr Bishop/ Nick you have yet again proven your acumen as a selector and tactician this series, making calls before not after the event, like any good analyst would. Schmidt was cruelled by injuries this series, more than was apparent initially. In both games injuries to Bobby V and Skelton’s fitness hampered the WBs, and Gleeson in Test 1, and Noah before, and JAS leading in. Picking TT would have been a huge risk after SR form, but yes, seems like it would have been worth taking in hindsight and many were suggesting before. We just don’t have the depth for that not to make a big impact. But Joe seems to have put his chips on Williams as long termer and is investing in him, like he did players in Ireland, when Williams is yet to deliver in this series (although the lineout has been solid when he’s on). Perhaps his time will come. JAS defence is perhaps the biggest issue as Nick you’ve pointed out now on multiple occasions. I just get flummoxed myself thinking about it, as any solution creates another problem, perhaps he just needs time and it just had to be this way….At the very least we need an A/B test and see what the experiment uncovers.


      As an Australian I stick to the paradoxical blend of unrealistic optimism and fatalism in reflecting on these decisions that has at once been the blessing and cruse of our culture historically.

      27 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ ‘There are coaches who make you believe in yourself more than ever. Steve is one of those’ ‘There are coaches who make you believe in yourself more than ever. Steve is one of those’