Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brian O'Driscoll picks 2021 Lions backline: 4 England and just 1 each from Ireland, Scotland and Wales

Owen Farrell on British and Irish Lions duty (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Iconic Lions midfielder Brian O’Driscoll, who skippered the tourists in 2005 and went on four tours, has chosen his preferred Test team backline for the 2021 tour to South Africa. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Irishman was part of the last trip to the home of the Springboks, playing a major part in the seismic 2009 second Test in Durban which was recently rerun on RugbyPass in the company of Bryan Habana, the ex-South African winger.

With just over a year now left to go before the latest Test series begins on July 24, 2021, in Johannesburg, interest in the potential Lions selection is increasing and the debate has now been massively fuelled by the identity of the Test team backline currently favoured by O’Driscoll. 

Video Spacer

Ex-Springboks winger Bryan Habana joins RugbyPass to watch a rerun of the epic 2009 second Test match between the Lions and South Africa in Durban

Video Spacer

Ex-Springboks winger Bryan Habana joins RugbyPass to watch a rerun of the epic 2009 second Test match between the Lions and South Africa in Durban

Unveiling his favourites in the UK Telegraph, O’Driscoll has chosen four Englishmen backed up by one from each of the remaining countries, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. 

O’Driscoll’s English quartet features wingers Anthony Watson and Jonny May, centre Manu Tuilagi and out-half Owen Farrell, the latter an especially interesting choice as the ’05 Lions captain suggested that time isn’t on Irishman Johnny Sexton’s side given his mid-30s age. “He is just a born winner,” said O’Driscoll of Farrell.   

Last month, Paul O’Connell, the 2009 Lions captain in South Africa, suggested that Farrell’s “abrasive attitude” had him primed to become the 2021 tour captain.

Regarding the wingers, O’Driscoll described Watson: “He’s so fast-twitch, a proper thoroughbred. The other thing I like about him is that he is fully committed.” He then added that May “must be one of the most improved players in world rugby”. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Manu Tuilagi was the fourth England player O’Driscoll has selected, suggesting the main question was who to partner him rather than which two midfield players to pick in the first place. Claiming it was a tough choice between Jonathan Davies and Garry Ringrose, O’Driscoll eventually chose his fellow Irishman. 

As regards full-back, Scotland’s Stuart Hogg was the choice on the basis that “he is coming into his peak years”, but O’Driscoll was less sure of his choice of Wales’ Tomos Williams at scrum-half, stating: “I don’t know who is going to be playing at nine and it is open”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search