Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brodie Retallick drops hint about All Blacks future after World Cup

Brodie Retallick. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Will he stay or will he go?

That has been the question surrounding Brodie Retallick’s future as the All Blacks‘ post-World Cup exodus begins to ramp up.

ADVERTISEMENT

There have been a raft of New Zealand internationals signing deals with offshore clubs from 2020 onwards, with Kieran Read (Toyota Verblitz), Ben Smith (Pau), Owen Franks (Northampton), Liam Squire (NTT Docomo Red Hurricanes), Waisake Naholo (London Irish), Nehe Milner-Skudder (Toulon), Jackson Hemopo (Mitsubishi Dynaboars), Luke Whitelock (Pau), Jordan Taufua (Leicester Tigers), Matt Proctor (Northampton) and Jeffery Toomaga-Allen (Wasps) all securing their futures in Europe or Japan after this year’s World Cup.

Rumours have been circulating of Retallick joining them, with the 75-test veteran yet to commit to either New Zealand Rugby or an overseas team with just eight months left on his existing contract with NZR.

The 27-year-old lock was linked with a switch to Premiership side Sale Sharks earlier this year, but shot down speculation of such a move on social media, posting: “No one thought to ask but no I’m not going to be playing for Sale … Not that I know off [sic] anyway.”

Since then, murmurings have arisen of reigning Japanese Top League champions Kobe Steelers chasing his signature in a move which would see him link up with former World Cup-winning All Blacks teammate Dan Carter.

That transfer could come in the form of a sabbatical move as leading All Blacks look to cash in on the Top League’s ‘double season’, when two seasons will be held within one year in 2020 as a result of a clash in scheduling with the World Cup in Japan.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Btjv9meAwiC/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

However, following the Chiefs’ emphatic 56-20 win over the Bulls in Pretoria over the weekend, Retallick suggested his future lay with the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to Sport24, the 2014 World Player of the Year said he felt he had more to offer to the All Blacks as he approaches his second World Cup campaign.

“In terms of my post-World Cup future, I’m not too sure yet and I’m still sort of working through that,” he said.

“At the conclusion of the World Cup, I will be 28-years-old and I would like to think that I still have something to offer the All Black jersey, but I have to work it [my future] out and see how it looks.

“I have been a part of the All Blacks for a while now and it’s been great. It was always a big goal of mine to make the All Blacks, and with the World Cup being at the back end of the year in Japan, it’s pretty big.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While maintaining that his sole focus for the time being is with the Chiefs – whose win in South Africa was their first of the year after a five-match winless run to open their campaign – Retallick was mindful of the excessive loss of talent and experience the All Blacks were set to concede at the end of the year.

The departure of captain Kieran Read was a particularly significant blow, but Retallick was confident that the All Blacks would be able to find a sufficient replacement.

“Kieran has been around for a long time and is certainly both a great player and leader, so there is definitely going to be a void there,” he said.

“But what New Zealand rugby prides itself on is that when someone steps away, it’s an opportunity for someone else to fill the void and stamp their mark on the black jersey.

“I’m sure that there are some young boys already wanting to step into the jersey when Kieran and a few others opt to go post-World Cup.”

Watch: Raelene Castle on Sunwolves axing:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search