Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brodie Retallick poised for uniquely historic outing at Twickenham

Brodie Retallick and Ian Foster, happy with their victory over Argentina in Hamilton. Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images

Brodie Retallick is in line for an especially historic night when the All Black lock runs out at Twickenham this weekend, as he will not only be making his 100th appearance for the team but also breaking the record for the most experienced locking partnership in history.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Twickenham test will mark the 64th game Retallick and Sam Whitelock have started alongside one another, a partnership spanning all ten of Retallick’s years with the team.

The North Canterbury-born lock will become the twelfth All Black centurion and told the media that at this point in his career, he’s familiar with the routine and celebrations that come with the milestone.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“There’s eleven players have done it and I’ve probably been around for nine,” Retallick said. “So I’ve seen how special it is and how cool of a moment it is for not only the player but their family so yea, looking forward to it.”

Retallick’s wife and two children will join him at Twickenham on Saturday to celebrate the occasion.

Injuries, overseas contracts and most recently a suspension have prolonged the wait to 100 caps, but along the way Retallick has racked up a remarkable resume, including the 2015 Rugby World Cup trophy and the 2014 World Rugby Player of the Year award.

“It’s certainly taken its time a little bit, at the back end compared to the first 50 but I’m proud and it’s awesome to still be here and still be able to represent the country and the jersey.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Retallick and Whitelock’s partnership is poised to outlast the notorious South African pairing of Bakkies Botha and Victor Matfield, players Retallick says he “looked up to and saw a lot of when I was younger”.

As for the recipe for the All Blacks pairing’s success, Retallick said “it’s probably hard to put one thing.”

“I guess Sam, he’s… 140-odd games, he knows what he’s doing and he’s got a wealth of experience and I guess when I came into the team he’d been there for three or four years so I was just always trying to push him and be competitive and probably at the start, trying to take his jersey I suppose.

“In hindsight, we’ve played a lot together and I guess it’s a relationship that I cherish a lot.

“He’s a farmer and a hunter, and I don’t do too much of that these days. But we definitely get on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“He runs the lineout, we often talk a little bit about what we’re seeing there but normally just trying to catch my breath.”

The match at hand will be the All Blacks’ final of the year and Retallick said the team were keen to round out a “rollercoaster” of a year on a positive note, by any means necessary.

“A win’s a win and you’d rather play bad and get a win than play well and lose, but we’ve been looking for some consistency.

“We’re looking to put it all together after the last couple of weeks and finish our year on a high.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search