Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brodie Retallick set for sideline stint following inexplicable yellow card

Brodie Retallick. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

While losing to Ireland would have been disappointing enough for the All Blacks on Saturday evening, there’s some added injury to the insult with second-rower Brodie Retallick likely to miss the opening rounds of the Rugby Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Retallick was involved in a head clash with Ireland prop Andrew Porter in the 49th minute of the match. Porter, as the defending player, was rightly held responsible for the clash and was shown a yellow card for the dangerous tackle, which forced Ireland to play with 14 men for 10 minutes. Retallick, however, was not able to return to the field after the tackle and in the post-match press conference, All Blacks coach Ian Foster revealed the 95-cap lock won’t be back on the park anytime soon.

“He’s got a broken cheekbone from a head-on-head contact,” said Foster following the 32-22 defeat.

Video Spacer

Sam Cane is lost for answers following the All Blacks’ series loss to Ireland.

Video Spacer

Sam Cane is lost for answers following the All Blacks’ series loss to Ireland.

“Broken bones are sort of six to eight [weeks],” he added when queried for how long Retallick would be out of action.

If Retallick is indeed sidelined for just six weeks, he will likely be ready for action in time for the All Blacks’ first home game of the Rugby Championship when they take on Argentina in Christchurch. He won’t, however, feature against the Springboks in South Africa over the opening two rounds of the competition.

Should Retallick’s injury require a longer time to heal – or if he’s simply not deemed match-fit even once he’s allowed back on the field, he might only be available for the final rounds of the tournament, when the All Blacks take on the Wallabies in Melbourne and Auckland.

Related

Either way, losing the fourth most experienced player in the squad will be a big blow for Foster’s men, who already have to cope without the likes of first-choice loosehead prop Joe Moody and  first-choice midfielder Anton Lienert-Brown.

ADVERTISEMENT

The fact that Porter was only sin-binned for the tackle on Retallick will have also hit a few nerves in New Zealand, given an almost identical tackle from All Black Angus Ta’avao in last weekend’s loss saw the tighthead prop red-carded and banned for three matches.

Foster agreed during the post-match presser that Porter’s yellow was likely another case of ‘card lottery’.

Compounding frustrations will be the fact that New Zealand-born midfielder Bundee Aki was also shown to have connected with Ofa Tuungafasi’s head with his shoulder when recklessly attempting to clear out a breakdown early in the second half.

While the All Blacks were able to score almost immediately after the foul play – however unintentional – from Aki, Tuungafasi had to leave the field for an HIA and never returned to the game. Despite Aki’s illegal clearout being plastered on the screens at Sky Stadium, referee Wayne Barnes missed it entirely, and Aki was free to play for the remainder of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a dark day for All Blacks supporters on Saturday, and with Retallick now set to miss NZ’s tour to South Africa, there could be more pain to come.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
B
Brian 889 days ago

Difference between later week and this week was the step forward into the contact by Ta’avao, very minor but that's the protocol

r
robespierre 889 days ago

Correct decision, I thought, probably should have been a yellow last week too.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search