Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brumbies hold firm to see off Stormers in crucial away win

Brumbies full-back Thomas Banks challenges for the ball against the Stormers.

A gutsy defensive effort has seen the ACT Brumbies record a stunning 19-17 Super Rugby victory over the Stormers in Cape Town.

ADVERTISEMENT

Seeking their first away win of the season, the Brumbies made the most of their rare visits into Stormers’ territory with three tries then pulled off a massive 226 tackles to come out on top at DHL Newlands.

Captain Christian Lealiifano described the Brumbies’ performance as “an incredible effort from our group”.

“(The Stormers) just kept us under pressure the whole time and we couldn’t really unlock our backline the way we wanted,” Lealiifano said.

“We had to find other ways and our defence was that today, we took our opportunities today when we did get them and the boys definitely saved some as well.”

In a controversial end to the first half, a video review after the halftime whistle saw a penalty try awarded to the Stormers with Brumbies winger Toni Pulu earning a yellow card for a high tackle on halfback Herschel Jantjies.

The ruling reduced the Brumbies’ advantage to 12-10 with the Stormers taking their first lead early in the second half but Tom Banks put the visitors back in front after 58 minutes and their defence stood tall under immense pressure to close out a famous victory.

ADVERTISEMENT

The result gives the Brumbies back-to-back wins as they move within reach of the Rebels and Waratahs in the Australian conference ahead of next week’s trip to Argentina to play the Jaguares.

Lock Rory Arnold handed the Brumbies a flying start, setting up Pete Samu for the opening try then scoring one of his own from a charge down as they jumped out to an early 12-3 lead.

It appeared that all the Stormers would tally from the first half was a ninth-minute penalty goal to Joshua Stander after passing on multiple chances to kick more points in favour of attacking the Brumbies’ line.

But that changed on the stroke of halftime after Pulu’s high tackle on Jantjies’ 30-metre dash to the line was deemed to deny a legitimate try-scoring opportunity. The Stormers made the most of their one-man advantage to start the second half with Wilco Louw barging over to put the home side in front.

ADVERTISEMENT

A try-saving tackle from Henry Speight prevented the Stormers from extending their advantage before the Brumbies cashed in again, running through 12 phases for an unmarked Tom Banks to score.

Lealiifano landed the conversion as the Brumbies regained the lead at 19-17 while Stander’s penalty miss in the 62nd minute proved costly in the final washup.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search