Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brumbies hoping to rebound from reality check against the Chiefs

Luke Reimer of the Brumbies runs with the ball during the round two Super Rugby Pacific match between Chiefs and ACT Brumbies at AAMI Park on March 03, 2024 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Graham Denholm/Getty Images)

ACT Brumbies coach Stephen Larkham hopes last weekend’s 34-point humbling at the hands of the Chiefs serves as a reality check for his team in the Super Rugby Pacific competition.

ADVERTISEMENT

Heading into Saturday’s first home game for the season against the Western Force, Larkham lamented the Brumbies’ inconsistency in copping 46 points against the Chiefs, the most they’ve conceded in a match since round three of 2017.

But having taken the loss so early in the campaign, Larkham called on his players to use it as inspiration as they look to better back-to-back semi-final finishes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“It’s consistency just across the board,” Larkham said.

“Defensively we obviously let in quite a few tries, some of those not necessarily from the defensive system, but certainly defensively we saw some inconsistencies there from our players.

“We had some issues around set piece as well – all things that are good to get early in the season, and things we can reflect back on.

“They had a few tactics out there that were quite successful as well and that will open our eyes.”

Team Form

Last 5 Games

4
Wins
2
1
Streak
2
21
Tries Scored
14
50
Points Difference
-42
4/5
First Try
1/5
2/5
First Points
2/5
4/5
Race To 10 Points
2/5

Larkham praised the application of his players on returning to training after the beatdown, as they prepare to tackle the Force and take on a familiar face in former long-term Brumby Nic White.

ADVERTISEMENT

They’ll go in without the injured Charlie Cale, resulting in the forward pack being shuffled to see Rob Valetini move to No.8 and Tom Hooper to the back row from lock.

Bench forward Cadeyrn Neville won’t play against the Force, recovering from stitches he needed after a sickening blow from Jared Proffit with the Chiefs prop copping a three-game suspension as a result.

Set for their first game this season at GIO Stadium after consecutive trips to Melbourne, Larkham hoped his team could once again use an early-season defeat as motivation to reach new levels.

“(It was) very similar to a couple of games last year actually … very similar in terms of the physical battle,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was very similar in terms of our preparation going into that game, and our mindset. It’s good to have it early in the season, and we can reflect back on it.

“Preparation at home is a lot easier without the travel but equally we’ve spoken about trying to create a great atmosphere out there by playing some exciting rugby.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search