Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brumbies rue blowing halftime lead in Christchurch

The Brumbies have blown a chance to end their Super Rugby drought against the Crusaders, falling away in the second half to lose 36-14 in Christchurch.

ADVERTISEMENT

The men from Canberra produced one of their most intense 40-minute efforts in recent memory to lead 7-0 at the break on Saturday, playing with a physicality and accuracy that threw the defending champions off kilter.

However, they couldn’t maintain it, conceding five tries in a one-sided second half, including a brace each to Crusaders wingers Sevu Reece and Will Jordan.

It means their decade-long wait to beat the nine-time champions goes on. The Brumbies haven’t won in Christchurch for nearly 20 years.

The result was a relief for the competition leaders, who were playing their first game Christchurch since the tragic mosque attacks three weeks earlier.

It was their sixth win from seven games this season while the Brumbies slump to a 2-5 record, the worst of the four Australian sides.

Coach Dan M cKellar’s decision to rest three Wallabies forwards following a bye week didn’t have any negative impact on their exceptional early output.

ADVERTISEMENT

Captain Christian Lealiifano darted over in the 32nd minute, capitalising on his team’s relentless tactic of keeping ball in hand and forcing mistakes from the ill-disciplined hosts.

The Crusaders conceded eight penalties to two by halftime and their Test prop Owen Franks was shown a yellow card in his 150th game for a no-arms tackle on Henry Speight.

Momentum swung on a big scrum from the home pack soon after the break and the tries followed.

Reece crossed once and Jordan twice in the third quarter as the Brumbies were forced into defence mode, struggling to shut down the crafty play-making of inside backs Richie Mo’unga and Ryan Crotty.

Yellow cards were shown to winger Toni Pulu and reserve lock Sam Carter, both for high tackles, making it even harder to stem the red and black tide.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lealiifano tr ied to squeeze the positives from the performance.

“A really impressive first half, we came out with the right intent,” he said.

“It was just a shame that we couldn’t continue that in the second half.

“They put us under a lot of pressure there in the second half and a quality side like that can hurt you from anywhere… but we’ll take plenty of confidence. There’s something to build on there.”

The Brumbies created the final try, when Pulu broke from distance to set up Tevita Kuridrani.

Crotty praised the Crusaders defence for not wilting when the Brumbies bossed the first spell.

“I don’t think we touched the ball for that second 20 minutes. It was awesome that we only let them in for seven,” he said.

“We talked about trust that momentum would come back our way. We just had to be good enough to execute when it did.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search