Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Call for a designated away fan area has whipped up fans on Twitter

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Harlequins’ Will Evans has called for the introduction of designated away fan areas at rugby stadiums to help improve the atmosphere at matches. The London club had its fans congregated in a particular section at last Sunday’s Heineken Champions Cup match away to Racing 92 and the noise that was generated is something that the club’s back-rower wants to be repeated elsewhere.

ADVERTISEMENT

Creating a racket in a designated away fan area isn’t something new to Harlequins – Danny Care has often remarked about the atmosphere the club’s fans generated at the June 2021 Gallagher Premiership semi-final when Bristol allocated them a specific area during a limited capacity match that took place during the pandemic restrictions.

It was also famously said Harlequins’ decision to group Leinster fans together in a designated block was a key factor in the Irish province’s 2009 Heineken European Cup quarter-final ‘Bloodgate’ win at The Stoop.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Evans wants the decibel levels at matches to be constantly raucous and he believes away sections at grounds are the way to go. Replying to a post-match video of Marcus Smith that Harlequins posted on their Twitter feed following last weekend’s Paris trip, Evans wrote: “Rugby stadiums NEED a designated away fan area that stays the same year on year.

“It’s impossible to create this level of atmosphere without it. Atmosphere = higher attendances/crazier games/better quality rugby. We can’t continue to hold the game back any longer.

“This bizarre myth that if people of the same club all sit together they will be violent or insightful is mind-numbing. It’s bordering on arrogance that we think we are the only sport where people can sit together and not be violent. Average attendances around the leagues are awful (even in Europe). It’s BAD to play in. Players want this. You will see a better product because of it. By all means, sit in the home end and chat with the locals, no problem. But it adds very little to the atmosphere inside the stadium.

“No one’s going to stop you from buying a ticket in the designated home section. Nor is anyone saying cordon or segregate anyone. But if fans want to add to the spectacle on the pitch by creating an atmosphere you can’t get by the current situation, why on earth stop that!?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Evans’ suggestion generated plenty of feedback both for and against the idea of a designated away fan area but perhaps the most insightful response in the current climate where rugby wants to grow came from fan Stephen Wall, who suggested that whatever the opinion more players need to speak up. “Fair play,” he wrote. “Need more current players stating their views in public.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search