Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Canterbury thumped by Bay of Plenty as 14-time champions risk missing play-offs for first time since 2003

(Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Perennial Mitre 10 Cup juggernauts Canterbury have been humbled 44-8 by Bay of Plenty in a result that leaves the 14-time provincial champions facing the prospect of missing the play-offs for the first time in 17 years.

ADVERTISEMENT

In sunny Saturday afternoon conditions in Tauranga, the Steamers ran amuck to hand the visitors their fourth – and biggest – loss of the season, leaving them one point astray of fourth-placed Wellington, who sit in the last semi-final spot.

However, the Lions have a game in hand still to play this weekend against a lowly Counties Manukau outfit in a fixture they are heavily favoured to emerge victorious from.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup || | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup || | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Should that be the case, and the likes of Waikato and Tasman win their respective matches, of which they are expected to, then the red-and-blacks could find themselves as far as six points off a qualification spot.

With three rounds left to play, Canterbury have a difficult run of games to close out the regular season against the Championship-leading Otago, reigning Mitre 10 Cup champions Tasman and top-of-the-table Auckland.

Given the credentials and winning records of those three sides, as well as Canterbury’s losing record and uninspiring performance against Bay of Plenty, it wouldn’t be out of the question to see them miss the semi-finals for the first time since 2003.

For a province that has only missed the play-offs three times in 26 years and has won nine of the past 12 titles, that would be a significant blow, especially considering the depth of talent evident within Mark Brown and Reuben Thorne’s side.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even more concerning is the lingering possibility of relegation into the Mitre 10 Cup Championship, something that would have been unthinkable prior to the season starting.

It is a concept that is inching closer to reality, though, as they sit six points astray from North Harbour, the side currently occupying last place in the Mitre 10 Cup Premiership.

A win for them in their Battle of the Bridge derby clash with Auckland on Saturday evening would bring that gap to just one-to-two points, leaving Canterbury in a precarious position as they head into the business end of their campaign.

In order to survive relegation and qualify for the Premiership semi-finals, much improvement will be needed when they return to Christchurch to host Otago next Friday given how freely Bay of Plenty were able to run in six tries to one.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steamers captain Chase Tiatia, starting in the midfield, opened the scoring by finishing off a scintillating set piece move inside the first 10 minutes, before the two sides traded penalties through the boots of Kaleb Trask and Fergus Burke.

Tiatia doubled his tally about 10 minutes after his first try, outpacing All Blacks Sevens star Andrew Knewstubb after charging a clearing kick down to slide over in the corner.

A yellow card to new Blues signing Sam Darry didn’t help Canterbury’s cause, and things went from bad to worse for the away side as Bay of Plenty were then awarded a penalty try just moments later after an offside player killed off a certain try-scoring chance.

Up 22-3 at half-time, Bay of Plenty continued their onslaught midway through the second half when All Blacks Sevens veteran Joe Webber capitalised on some champagne rugby to dot down out wide.

Another yellow card was dished out to Canterbury, with hooker Nathan Vella sent to the sin bin as a result of his side’s high penalty count.

His absence added to Canterbury’s woes, as did Trask, who was on hand to finish off a special backline move that saw Tiatia and Webber combine via a cross-kick chip, which the latter flicked back in-field into the hands of the young Chiefs playmaker.

All Blacks Sevens skipper Scott Curry, coming off the bench as a reserve lock, finished off the demolition job as he charged onto the ball to score under the posts after Blues flyer Emoni Narawa took full advantage of a misjudged catch from a midfield bomb by Canterbury replacement first-five Brett Cameron.

With the scoreline reading 44-3, the Cantabrians earned themselves a consolation try in the final few minutes through No. 8 Cullen Grace, who was released from the All Blacks camp to play in the match.

Canterbury will be without his services for the remainder of the competition as he departs for Australia to compete in the Tri Nations on Sunday, though, leaving Thorne and Brown with a tricky job to overturn such a hefty defeat in just six days’ time.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 19 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search