Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cardiff chairman pens open letter to fans after exit of Dai Young

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Chairman Alun Jones has penned an open letter to Cardiff supporters less than 24 hours after it was confirmed that Dai Young had left his director of rugby position. The ex-Wales prop was suspended last April after he was accused of bullying members of staff, a claim that he categorically denied.

ADVERTISEMENT

An independent investigation found insufficient evidence to support the bullying allegations made against Young, but the coach decided on Monday it was best to step away from the club.

A statement released at the time read: “Unfortunately this process has caused strain on the working relationship between Cardiff Rugby and Dai Young. In the circumstances, regrettably, it has been mutually agreed by the parties to terminate Dai’s employment contract in accordance with terms within that allow for early termination.”

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

This media release has now been followed on Tuesday by Jones delivering his perspective on what unfolded at the Welsh club in recent times. The chairman began his letter by thanking supporters for their patience regarding a process where legal matters meant that Cardiff were unable to make any rugby-related announcements these past few months.

“First of all, I’d like to thank you for your patience, understanding and support during what has been one of the most challenging periods in the club’s long history.

Related

“I fully accept that most supporters will have felt frustrated by the lack of communication from the club during this period, but our hands have been tied both in relation to our discussions with the WRU and then with regard to the position with Dai Young.

“As I am sure most of you will appreciate, there is not a lot more I can say in relation to the latter other than what was released in the press announcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“What I can say is that the board responded to concerns raised in an appropriate fashion and that the subsequent process was carried out in a fully independent, professional, and thorough manner. It was unfortunate that this took far longer than anticipated, but this was due to circumstances beyond our control.

“It is regrettable that the club and Dai have parted company, but we are now focused on the future and ensuring we move forward during what continues to be a challenging time for the professional game in Wales.

“For legal reasons, we were unable to make any rugby-related announcements during the investigation but we are now in a position to confirm a number of signings and re-signings. We can also resume work on recruitment and retention, albeit with the reduced budgets arising from the new agreement with the WRU. You can expect plenty of announcements on this in the coming days.

“The above constraints aside, we recognise that our communication with you needs to improve, and we have agreed to a revised communications framework which will be implemented immediately. This includes a recommitment to communications from myself, our CEO, Richard Holland, and bi-annual Q&As with board members.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our immediate priority now is of course on securing and implementing a succession plan for rugby and once this is in place we can really begin building for the future.

“It is important to acknowledge the fact that next season is going to be incredibly challenging on the pitch, but the most important thing is we as a club are here, we are secure, and we have a foundation to build from.

“Growing from within will be a significant part of our strategy going forward and we are fortunate to boast a superb player pathway. It is vitally important now that we harness its full potential as well as further develop the relationship with the Rags.

“It is also now four months since we lost our life president Peter Thomas CBE and this has had an enormous impact on the club.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search