Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Castrogiovanni accused of never being eligible to play for Italy

Martin Castrogiovanni was born in Argentina, but represented Italy at international level. (Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Famed Italy tighthead Martin Castrogiovanni has been accused of never being eligible to play for the Azzurri after he talked about his family background during a recent interview. Born in Parana in Argentina, the retired 40-year-old prop won 119 caps for his adopted European country between 2002 and 2016.

ADVERTISEMENT

In an in-depth interview published on rugbychampagneweb.com, the front-rower explained his family background, telling the interviewer: “Grandpa Castro was born in Argentina, his name was Jose Maria. The one who was Italian was my great-grandfather, Angel, who was born in Sicily, in Franco Forte.”

This detail has now been fastened onto by Tier 2 Rugby, a busy social media account containing news and opinions focusing on tier two rugby nations. A tweet in reply to the interview claimed that Castrogiovanni was never eligible to play for Italy.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“Wow. One of Italy’s best players of the modern era, Martin Castrogiovanni, who played in four World Cups and won 119 caps over a 14-year international career, admits only his great-grandfather was Italian and thus should not have been eligible for Italy.”

The claim sparked an online debate regarding the eligibility rules that governed the international rugby scene at that time when Castrogiovanni made his breakthrough.

The Tier 2 Rugby account went on to add: “Italy did play RWC qualifiers back in 2002. They faced Spain and Romania in a three-team round-robin with the top two sides qualifying. As Castro played both those games (and was not yet eligible then on residency either), Spain should have qualified for RWC 2003.”

One reader, Salomon Tardman, insisted that Castrogiovanni was eligible to play. “The eligibility rules were different in each country at the time, not yet unified by World Rugby,” he explained. “I think to remember Italy allowed for third-generation emigrants to play for them if they hadn’t played for another country at senior level. So Castro, and Italy, respected the rules.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The debate regarding the eligibility rules from 20 years ago potentially preventing Spain from qualifying for the 2003 World Cup in Australia is ironic in the sense that the Spanish were disqualified in recent months from the 2023 World Cup next year in France for fielding an ineligible player in two of their qualifying matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
H
Hernan 843 days ago

Rubbish lazy "reporting" from the people at Tier 2. What is their knowledge regarding acquiring Italian citizenship? Castro did not give any details regarding that. I am Argentine Italian as he is and I acquire it through my mother because my great grandfather was her grandfather thus making her eligible. I acquired it from her.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
TI 2 hours ago
All Blacks player ratings vs Italy | Autumn Nations Series

Rieko took literally years to turn from a defensive liability at 13 into a guy, who’s defensively sound as it befits the position. And it all came at the cost of him being much less of an offensive threat, than what he used to be. Proctor is a natural 13, he handles, passes, and kicks way better than Rieko ever will, he just isn’t as fast.


It’s unfair to judge Tupaea on the handful of games he’s had in 2022 before he got nearly crippled by a Wallaby lock. What could Tupaea/Proctor pairing be, if they got the same amount of chances as Jordie/Rieko?


Because no matter how you spin it, playing a player outside of his natural position is a poor asset management. No matter how talented he is, he still competes against players who had years and years of practice at the position. And if said guy is so talented that he actually CAN compete against specialists, imagine how much better still he could have been, if he had all those years to iron the toothing issues at the position. It just drives me mad.


Two things I hate in rugby union beyond description: aping after league, and playing players outside of their natural position. Especially considering, that they all admit they hate it, when they’re allowed to speak freely. Owen Farrell spent 80% of his international career at 12, saying every time when asked, that he is a 10 and prefers to play at 10. Those players are literally held at a gunpoint: play out of position, or no national jersey for you.

47 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search