Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Challenge Cup : Pau a tenu 50 minutes à Johannesburg

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - DECEMBER 14: P J Botha and Ruben Schoeman of Emirates Lions in action with Thomas Souverbie of Section Paloise during the EPCR Challenge Cup match between Emirates Lions and Section Paloise at Emirates Airline Park on December 14, 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Gallo Images)

La Section Paloise a craqué dans la dernière demi-heure face aux Emirates Lions, mais repart de Johannesburg avec un bon point de bonus offensif à l’issue d’un match prolifique (défaite 45-35).

Rencontre
Challenge Cup
Lions
43 - 35
Temps complet
Pau
Toutes les stats et les données
ADVERTISEMENT

Pau, pour le premier déplacement de son histoire en Afrique du Sud, n’a pas manqué son début de rencontre malgré un coup d’envoi décalé d’une bonne heure à cause de gros orages arrosant la région de Johannesburg.

Les Béarnais sont en effet restés au contact des locaux une bonne partie du match. Ils l’ont notamment dû à l’apport d’Axel Desperes, auteur de 18 des 23 premiers points des siens (un essai, trois pénalités, trois transformations à l’arrivée).

Ils menaient même 23-19 à la suite de l’essai de leur ouvreur international U20 (45e) et Palois pure souche mais tout s’est gâté par la suite.

Graphique d'évolution des points

Lions gagne +8
Temps passé en tête
55
Minutes passées en tête
14
67%
% du match passés en tête
17%
82%
Possession sur les 10 dernières minutes
18%
3
Points sur les 10 dernières minutes
7

Grégoire Arfeuil, vu avec l’équipe de France de rugby à VII ces dernières semaines, écopait d’un carton jaune trois minutes plus tard, et provoquait un essai de pénalité. A peine quelques secondes plus tard, Lekima Tagitagivalu en faisait de même.

Plus costauds, les Sud-Africains n’en demandaient pas tant et le 2e ligne Ruben Schoeman en profitait pour signer un doublé en huit minutes (53e, 61e). De quoi faire gonfler le score à 40-23.

Les Palois avaient le mérite de ne rien lâcher et marquaient deux essais (Ruffenach 63e, Bouhier 74e) qui leur apportaient un point de bonus important en vue de la qualification pour les 8es de finale après le succès décroché la semaine dernière devant Newcastle.

ADVERTISEMENT


Vous souhaitez être parmi les premiers à vous procurer des billets pour la Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2027 en Australie ? Inscrivez-vous ici.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress'

Haha yeah I know, sorry I just cbf doing anything other than sprouting the garbage that comes in. You either follow the train of thought or don't most the time, that's why I like you, happy to not take it serious like, and reply regardless.

Haha more imaginary rational. You mean in 2018 and 19 he used 36 new players?

more = you're following in Saders footsteps (here I go again assuming you know what I'll mean haha)

imaginary = fictitious world cups (no WC in 2018)

by "months before" you mean 2018/19? = because you wrote 2018 i'm assuming that's because your brain was thinking about that year when he used most of those 36 players

36 new players = because it's absolutely impossible to use 36 new players in the handful of games you get, or "months", before a WC

Doesn't really sound like good coaching and reinforces other theories. Wouldn't spread that.

Doesn't really sound like good coaching = that is waay to many players no matter what way you spin it, or what period. Where did you even get the data for that from?

reinforces other theories = no need to go into them here but it definitely suggests a case of being lucky to win despite the fact (if true) imo

Wouldn't spread that = cheekyness about above point


So yeah, you can see why I don't try to elaberate my posts so everyone can understand and sadly theyre too succinct for some with a slightly different lingo or thought.

and two years of >85% win ratio on the trot - I’d love to see how he’d have down with better coaching.

the none TLDR version reply..

two years = but weren't you following the similar line of this article that Razor needs to open it up? Why would you think that when you're suggesting he's got another 3 or 4 years before he reaches that point in tenure when he should also be trying to hit the 85 mark?

>85% win ratio on the trot = WC years are short and provide easy opposition, you don't normally include them. 22 would be more relevant, and this year you had both other top teams at home, so you'd think that 85 number is overs, or 'above' average based on circumstances (85 is a really fabulous number however so going back to 80 would also still be great)

love to see how he’d have done with better coaching. = well it's exactly the opposite of above isn't it, it's operating at well over 70 for 4 (excl covid) of those 7 years instead of his 60%, before hitting the 80s mark.


You might also ask well how could that be possible when he's done so bloody well just to do what he's done? Well I'm not going to take him (or SA) down a beg or two, instead I'll give you the hint (because I'm over thinking how to type long versions of replys), the answer is in this article!


Can you think of any specific players that became instrumental to the team from those 36 new players? One's plucked out of nowhere so to speak? I know for the first two years after covid he switched up you're team and tactics after each game against NZ (for the second), I think winning both 1st games and losing both rematch's? You don't think he should ever have done that differently, not been so happy to give up a victory against the ABs?

262 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Top 100: Why Antoine Dupont is the best player in the world Top 100: Why Antoine Dupont is the best player in the world
Search