Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Championship Rugby statement: Unanimous opposition to Premiership 2

(Photo by George Wood/Getty Images)

Championship Rugby clubs have quashed RFU hopes that a Premiership 2 franchise model might be set up in the future in England to underpin the Gallagher Premiership.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was last month, in the wake of the demise of 2022/23 Championship champions Jersey Reds, when Bill Sweeney, the RFU CEO, stressed their commitment to second-tier rugby.

He said at the time: “We firmly believe that a strong second tier is important for the development of the game. It is not something that is easy to get right. We have had consistent talks with the Championship clubs since a meeting in Farnborough last February.

“We have been talking about the shape of Premiership 2, academies, player development and mechanisms. We have not been able to confirm the level of funding which will have to wait until the professional game partnership is agreed.

“We have said we will advise them ahead of next season and there has been much more dialogue than before. It has been a challenge but we are committed to it and would ideally like to have a system similar to France, but the average attendance in the Championship is 1,300. We need to grow that and it will not happen overnight.”

The 11 remaining Championship clubs met on Friday to consider their next steps and they decided not to back the franchise model. A statement read: “The 11 Championship clubs came together today to debate their collective future: whether our league will be best served by capitalising on the potential of its commercial rights and its brand-identity to underpin a truly ‘whole-game solution’ to tier two, or by considering a putative Premiership 2 based on a franchise model.

“The clubs agreed unanimously that they are opposed to the franchise model. This was concluded against the backdrop of:

  1. Our desire to find whole-game solutions rather than creating obstacles within the pyramid of club rugby;
  2. Significant doubt about whether there would ever be promotion and relegation into and from the Premiership – a basic question of fairness;
  3. Our objection to a franchise model that would allow non-meritocratic entry to P2;
  4. Our unwillingness to commit to a tender process.

“The Championship clubs also agreed that they would continue discussions with the RFU while simultaneously exploring concrete ways of strengthening our existing league.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our aim is to sustain a second tier of English rugby that adheres to the following principles:

  • The Championship will be at the top of the competitive pyramid in England, open to all clubs who have the ability, aspiration and ambition to compete in it;

  • The clubs intend to participate in the most competitive environment possible, with the ultimate objective of reaching the very top, assuming there is equitable treatment by those currently controlling that route;

  • We intend to be financially sustainable and will rigorously explore and exploit the potential of the commercial rights and brand identity that our league possesses;

  • We will offer the highest level of professionalism affordable, aligned with the amateur ethos we hold dear and which is at the heart of the game;

  • Through the history of our clubs, we represent the proudest traditions and values of rugby and so we will continue to build our community relationships and encourage rugby at all levels;

  • We commit to working with the RFU and PRL to grow the game from the grassroots upwards, with a focus on developing and encouraging young players as part of a pathway to the top. This will feed through into National teams at all levels;

  • We will work with the RPA to set the highest standards for player welfare and education.

“We hope and expect that the Rugby Football Union will wish to continue to support our league as part of a whole-game approach to solving the sport’s challenges. This league, as its principles make clear, will fulfil vital roles in the development of the game in England.

“It would, if permitted, also continue to act as a connecting bridge between the Premiership, the England national set-up and the rest of the sport at National League and all other levels.

“We believe this is the only sustainable way forward. It ensures the integrity and the competitive heartbeat of our sport. It will be the best guarantee available for the success of future efforts to improve the quality of play and the quantity of participation, from top to bottom, of English rugby.

Related

“On the vexed matter of promotion and relegation, we will always believe in the right of the best to rise to the top. At present, the well-identified barriers put in our way make this a pipedream, but we will work unceasingly to challenge and correct this.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Along with other observers, we have to acknowledge the position in which the Premiership finds itself, and we all have to find a sustainable way forward. For the National Leagues and below, we would welcome the competition that our vision of the future guarantees, a future based on on-field success.

“Having agreed on these principles, the Championship clubs have authorised the executive of the Championship to go ahead with the production of a comprehensive plan for our continuing league to be presented to other stakeholders in the game as soon as practicable.

“We fully appreciate the consequential effects of our decision to reject a franchise system. However, we feel certain that we have taken account of all the key components that can form a successful and sustainable recovery of rugby in this country, at least as far as it concerns the elements of the future that we can influence.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
B
Brunhildes 397 days ago

Good. I wouldn’t want to get into bed anymore than is absolutely necessary with the horrorshow of the Premiership and the RFU under Sweeney.

J
Jon 399 days ago

This is awesome, much respect. Premiership clubs have there own second tier league don’t they? Those players should really be playing in the national leagues like the Championship. I assume an automatic qualification spot in both european tournaments would be an improvement and incentive as well?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search