Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The changes Cheika must make to pull off history

Cheika must find solutions fast for Bledisloe 1's problems.

Michael Cheika’s Wallabies left Bledisloe Game 1 in Sydney with a disappointing 38-13 defeat, giving them the unenviable task of heading to Eden Park to square the series.

ADVERTISEMENT

History is now against Cheika’s side, with a seemingly insurmountable challenge ahead. They have just a week-long preparation to somehow turnaround a malfunctioning set-piece and come up with a plan to do what no other side has done in the last 20 years.

The capitulation at both lineout and scrum means Cheika needs to re-think his pack, with a few selection casualties required following a poor performance.

Lukhan Tui failed to deliver as Cheika’s enforcer, coming up with a key drop and a poor missed tackle that led to an All Blacks try. His tall frame can end up too upright on occasion, meaning he can’t seem to carry as effectively in close channels.

It would be easy to discard Tui, but he can still provide value and athleticism to the pack. His athleticism showed flashes on the edges, where a skillful offload put debutant Maddocks away for a line break in the second half. In a radical move, he could be used as a lock to make way for Pete Samu to join the starting side. That means either Izack Rodda or Adam Coleman would have to be dropped, and based on form it would have to be Coleman.

Rodda provides more quickness in the lineout, his movement off the mark is more explosive than the experienced Coleman. Whilst a rock solid defender, Coleman looked lethargic as a jumper in game one and was rendered useless by Sam Whitelock and Brodie Retallick at lineout time. The Wallabies need speed to the jump at the lineout, where they were outclassed in Game 1.

Confusingly, the lineout calls became more basic as the game went on, with almost no deception or attempt to manipulate space with player movement and four-man and five-man operations. It became easier and easier for Whitelock and Retallick to prey on Wallabies ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pete Samu will give them more mobility within the lineout and forward pack, giving the Wallabies a chance to rectify a poor performance in Sydney.

Sekope Kepu produced a valiant second-half display after a poor showing in the first. He played on despite a brutal eye injury and got through an improved work rate in the second stanza but unfortunately, the Wallabies need more athleticism around the park. Kepu wasn’t as reliable at scrum time either. With the Wallabies pack needing a jumpstart, if fit, Taniela Tupou needs to start in the front row replacing Kepu, along with Scott Sio.

Tupou’s scrummaging was one of the competition’s best this year in Super Rugby, and he brings a power running game like no other player in World Rugby. He has come a long way since a Super Rugby pre-season scrummaging lesson at the hands of Franks as an 18-year-old. It’s time for Thor to be elevated to the starting lineup. There will be no better time to do it – Tupou will be keen to impress on return to the city he was schooled in, having attended Sacred Heart in Auckland.

Tatafu Polota-Nau should be given another opportunity to start at hooker, but replacement Tolu Latu should be dropped in favour of Folau Faainga solely based on form.

ADVERTISEMENT

Latu made poor decisions to pass when two promising opportunities were presented, both times failing to execute. He missed throws at the lineout and missed four tackles in a forgettable night.

The backs did well for large periods of the match but a scrum move that came undone in the 51st minute was the catalyst for a Wallabies collapse. Dane Haylett-Petty dropped the ball cold, an inexcusable error which led to Beauden Barrett’s try.

With Israel Folau now ruled out with an ankle injury, Cheika has to weigh up who will replace him. Haylett-Petty defended well on the wing whilst he was on the park and should be kept there. It will be tempting to move him to fullback but the edge defence is so important against the All Blacks. Jack Maddocks was burned by Waisake Naholo after a moment’s hesitation in the dying stages, illustrating this first hand.

Video Spacer

Starting the 21-year-old Maddocks on the wing is not a good idea at Eden Park, but the Wallabies should consider playing him in his natural position at fullback where he is comfortable under the high ball. He won’t have frontline defensive duties but will be heavily involved in the game in attack. If he is more important as a bench utility, the in-form Tom Banks presents the next best option.

Stand-in centre Reece Hodge proved he could give be relied on in the Wallabies midfield as he was one of the better performers on the night. His defence, particularly at set-piece time, kept the midfield closed for the All Blacks. He deserves another start at 13.

Winger Marika Koroibete was unlucky to be stripped one-on-one by Naholo as his knee hit the ground, but still finished the night with a 50% tackle success rate, with five misses. He provides speed in attack and was useful in a couple of situations in Game 1, but defensive concerns are very real. Without another option though, he looks to start again.

The Wallabies defence was heavily criticised by the Australian media, but this wasn’t as bad as it seems. The All Blacks scored 21 points within one phase of turnover ball, which is historically difficult for any side to defend. The Wallabies lone try came from the same situation, in the first phase following an intercept by Michael Hooper.

It will be more important for the Wallabies to reduce unforced errors and limit transition phases, which the All Blacks utilise far more effectively. Even Brodie Retallick’s great try came four phases after the big man stripped Will Genia one-on-one. That first phase yielded a Barrett line break which got the All Blacks on the front foot.

Aside from set-piece, the most worrying aspect was the performance of the bench as a unit. As detailed above, Latu’s performance was only one of many forgettable cameos.

Nick Phipps’ performance was nothing short of pathetic. His six minutes on the field resulted in two poor defensive efforts against Naholo (conceding two line breaks and a try), one shocking pass from a scrum move that went forward and was turned over, and one errant offload that again was snapped up by an All Black.

Genia has to play eighty minutes or the Wallabies need to call up Jake Gordon as Phipps does not meet the standard required of an international halfback currently. The third option Joe Powell doesn’t offer much more confidence and it remains a mystery as to why Gordon isn’t in this squad.

The only replacement who had a net positive impact was the rookie Maddocks, who took a nice high ball and finished with a try on debut despite one lapse in defence.

A reinforced starting lineup will allow some of the starters like Tom Robertson to resume duties on the bench, which should yield a better performance in the closing stages.

Even so, making the required adjustments is no guarantee of getting the result and should they lose again they will rue the performance of the Sydney test. The Wallabies continue to flounder under Cheika’s watch, with a deteriorating record against Tier 1 nations.

The Wallabies and Cheika need an Eden Park miracle to turn the ship around.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 2 hours ago
Brett Robinson looks forward to 'monumental' year in 2025

I'm not very hopeful of a better change to the sport. Putting an Aussie in charge after they failed for two decades is just disgusting. What else will be brought in to weaken the game? What new rule changes will be made? How will the game be grown?


Nothing of value in this letter. There is no definitive drive towards something better. Just more of the same as usual. The most successful WC team is getting snubbed again and again for WC's hosting rights. What will make other competitions any different?


My beloved rugby is already a global sport. Why is there no SH team chosen between the Boks, AB's, Wallabies and Fiji? Like a B&I Lions team to tour Europe and America? A team that could face not only countries but also the B&I Lions? Wouldn't that make for a great spectacle that will also bring lots of eyeballs to the sport?


Instead with an Aussie in charge, rugby will become more like rugby league. Rugby will most likely become less global if we look at what have become of rugby in Australia. He can't save rugby in Australia, how will he improve the global footprint of rugby world wide?


I hope to be proven wrong and that he will raise up the sport to new heights, but I am very much in doubt. It's like hiring a gardener to a CEO position in a global company expecting great results. It just won't happen. Call me negative or call me whatever you'd like, Robinson is the wrong man for the job.

3 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

The question that pops into my mind with Fergus Burke, and a few other high profile players in his boots right now, and also many from the past to be fair, is can the club scene start to take over this sentimentality of test footy being the highest level? Take for a moment a current, modern day scenario of Toulouse having a hiccup and failing to make this years Top 14 Final, we could end up seeing the strongest French side in History touring New Zealand next year. Why? Because at any one time they could make up over half the French side, but although that is largely avoided, it is very likely at the national teams detriment with the understanding these players have of playing together likely being stronger than the sum of the best players throughout France selected on marginal calls.


Would the pinnacle of the game really not be reached in the very near future by playing for a team like Toulouse? Burke might have put himself in a position where holding down a starting spot for any nation, but he could be putting himself in the hotbed of a new scene. Clearly he is a player that cherishes International footy as the highest level, and is possibly underselling himself, but really he might just be underselling these other nations he thinks he could represent.

Burke’s decision to test the waters with either England or Scotland has been thrown head-first into the spotlight by the relative lack of competition for the New Zealand 10 shirt.

This is the most illogical statement I've ever read in one of your articles Nick. Burke is behind 3 All Stars of All Black rugby, it might be a indictment of New Zealand rugby but it is abosolutely apparent (he might have even said so himself) why he decided to test the waters.

He mattered because he is the kind of first five-eighth New Zealand finds it most difficult to produce from its domestic set-up: the strategic schemer, the man who sees all the angles and all the bigger potential pictures with the detail of a single play.

Was it not one of your own articles that highlighted the recent All Black nature to select a running, direct threat, first five over the last decade? There are plenty of current players of Burke's caliber and style that simply don't fit the in vogue mode of what Dan Carter was in peoples minds, the five eight that ran at the slightest hole and started out as a second five. The interesting thing I find with that statement though is that I think he is firmly keeping his options open for a return to NZ.

A Kiwi product no longer belongs to New Zealand, and that is the way it is. Great credo or greater con it may be, but the free market is here to stay.

A very shortsighted and simplistic way to end a great article. You simply aren't going to find these circumstances in the future. The migration to New Zealand ended in 1975, and as that generation phases out, so too will the majority of these ancestry ties (in a rugby context) will end. It would be more accurate to say that Fergus Burke thought of himself as the last to be able to ride this wave, so why not jump on it? It is dying, and not just in the interests or Scottish of English fans.

47 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING USA ‘will be a team who could beat England’ by World Cup 2025 USA ‘will be a team who could beat England’ by World Cup 2025
Search