Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Wouldn’t rather play any team’: Chiefs embracing Crusaders’ challenge

The Chiefs celebrate a try in Super Rugby Pacific. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The Crusaders are potentially 80 minutes away from their seventh title in as many years.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a record that is undoubtedly to the envy of the rest of the competition, and it potentially gives them an advantage ahead of the decider.

But the Chiefs aren’t shying away from the challenge.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Following a sensational year, the Hamilton-based side is embracing the opportunity to dethrone the reigning champions on the biggest stage in Super Rugby Pacific.

While the ladder leaders failed to keep their unbeaten streak alive throughout the entire season – losing to the Reds in New Plymouth – there’s no denying the championship pedigree of the Chiefs.

But with one game to go in the campaign, the facts are simple: the Crusaders know how to win finals, while the Chiefs are looking to win their first title since 2013.

But again, the Chiefs are embracing the challenge.

On the day of the final, departing centre Alex Nankivell said there’s no team the Chiefs would rather play than the Crusaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’ve been the benchmark, haven’t they, for a long time and the results show that with the amount of championships they’ve won,” Nankivell told Weekend Sport with Jason Pine.

“I think for us, we wouldn’t rather play any team in the final. We love playing the Crusaders, it’s a bit of a rivalry going on for the last few years playing them.

“It’s really exciting, it’s going to be an awesome challenge.”

The Chiefs set the tone in the opening round of the season with an emphatic 31-10 victory over the Crusaders in Christchurch.

Following a run of sensational wins, the Chiefs kept their unbeaten streak alive in late April when they faced the Crusaders again – beating them by 10 points in Hamilton.

ADVERTISEMENT

But this is finals footy.

Whether or not it gives the Chiefs a “psychological edge” depends on who you ask, but Nankivell insisted that the hosts are full of belief heading into the decider.

“I think it probably more so gives us confidence because we know we can beat them, we know our game works,” he added.

“I think that just gives us confidence going into the game that we can play our game, trust the preparation that we’ve done and we know it works if we get it right.

“I’m not too sure about the psychological edge, you’d probably have to ask one of them if it does or not, but we’re confident that we know we can topple them if we’re on our game.”

This year’s Super Rugby Pacific final between the Chiefs and Crusaders gets underway at 7.05 pm NZST at Hamilton’s FMG Stadium Waikato on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search