Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Chiefs midfielder Johnny Fa'auli is a Hitman stuck in the wrong era

Johnny Fa’auli

Another dangerous tackle from Johnny Fa’auli, this time on Hurricanes midfielder Wes Goosen, sent the Hurricanes official twitter account into meltdown and head coach Chris Boyd into anger.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 22-year-old Chiefs enforcer is dealing with a growing rap sheet – his judiciary hearing tonight could add another suspension to the four weeks he received last year for a no-arms tackle against the Bulls.

The crackdown on high tackles and the issues surrounding concussions in the game is turning Johnny Fa’auli into something of an outlaw. Whilst this latest incident resulted in an ugly outcome, there are marginal differences between this tackle and the one he delivered two months earlier on Reds number 8 Caleb Timu, which was applauded by commentators at the time as ‘legal’ and ‘a good hit’.

Video Spacer

On Friday night against the Hurricanes, he led with the shoulder and made first contact with the head, leaving Goosen heavily concussed. Goosen, preparing for contact, crouched his body in an attempt to bump his opponent off, lowering his head into the firing line of Fa’auli’s trajectory. Such is the velocity of the game, split-second judgments can’t always be accurate. When multiple players are involved, the tackle area becomes a complex sum of moving parts, sometimes with adverse outcomes.

Video Spacer

Goosen’s decision to crouch into the tackle and attempt to win the collision unfortunately played as much a part as Fa’auli’s low-to-high tackle technique. If he stays upright and draws and passes, he may get hit late but contact with the head is avoidable.

“I mean, I don’t like to see a red card in any game, but red is red, and you don’t get a more obvious red card than that. That was shoulder, no arms, straight to the head, with force, with intent. There’s no butting out of any of that,” head coach Chris Boyd said after the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a deliberate act.”

The outcome of the tackle, under the rules, certainly justified the decision to hand Fa’auli a red card, however, it is overzealous to make claims of deliberate intent. Sure, he intended to make a big shot, maybe temporarily sting Goosen, but deliberate malicious intent to injure him with a concussion? Highly doubtful.

The moment he decides to launch, he loses sight of the target by tucking his head. His arm movement is questionable, often late to wrap but enough evidence is there that he is attempting a legal tackle. Never is the arm tucked inwards towards the chest like the traditional shoulder charge.

Fa’auli’s technique is fraught with risk but the payoff is big. The midfielder has a liking for a big shot that can set the tone for his side and swing momentum or cause a turnover.

If the onus is on the defender to account for any movement the ball carrier makes, including ducking or lowering of the torso then Fa’auli is guilty of that, and only that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both players were expecting the opposite of each other – Goosen, anticipating a low tackle, prepared to meet him low. Fa’auli sighting Goosen upright launched upward into his chest area. Both players misjudged the collision area, resulting in a sickening blow. As the defender, Fa’auli takes the blame, but it can’t be called deliberate.

The end result will likely be a second long suspension in two seasons, seeing him banned from playing in the opening rounds of 2019.

His tribulations mirror that of another dreadlocked 12 that also dealt with a fair share of criticism for his tackle technique at times – ex-All Black Ma’a Nonu. Who can forget the no-arms, blindside shoulder charge on Piri Weepu when he was at the Highlanders? That was real force, a league-style shoulder charge worthy of the NRL in the mid-noughties era.

Old school centre Brian Lima, also revered for his brutal tackling, was nicknamed the ‘Chiropractor’ for his back-breaking hits. A review of any of his ‘greatest’ hits will reveal far worse infringements than Fa’auli.

With the game becoming more aware of the long-term effects of concussions, he will have to shelve his launch approach or risk spending more time on the sidelines with more instances like these. When it comes off its’ a crowd pleaser and when it doesn’t the consequences are disastrous. And it is a few centimetres between both.

Johnny Fa’auli is a Hitman stuck in the wrong era.

ADVERTISEMENT

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 13 minutes ago
How 'misunderstood' Rassie Erasmus is rolling back the clock

Nick - thanks for another good piece.


It’s remarkable that Matt Williams gets so upset about Bomb Squad tactics. He’s not just making recommendations, but getting all sweaty about bench splits. But it’s not really about bench splits. He just does not like forwards, and their role in the game.


I thought this quote was telling:

What about Kitshoff, what happened to his spine in South Africa? Do we know if that is as a result of the scrummaging they are put through?

Ouch. So we are really on a program of reducing scrummaging to reduce spinal injuries? That’s the mission? And based on the statistically significant dataset of one case, a case in which he openly admits that he does not have the details. Regardless, if his goal is to reduce spinal injuries for prop forwards then arguing about bench splits seems like an odd place to start.


It’s not just spinal injuries that he cares about. The risk of paralysis is an important issue, and he raises this too:

I’m a bit of a lone voice but, because of my club-mate Grant Harper (ex-Western Suburbs prop who was paralysed after a collapsed scrum), I’m not shutting up on it.

Injuries are horrible, and paralysis is truly awful. We should absolutely take it very seriously, and diligently implement whatever safety protocols and education programs we can to minimize these things. But we don’t ban skydiving or hang gliding, or crossing the road. Though Williams is not looking to ban rugby, he does seem to be intent on reducing the role of forwards in the game, based on entirely anecdotal data.


It’s hard to tell what it’s all about. He makes this supposed safety case and says that no-one in his echo chamber disagrees with him:

Every time I go out, old forwards and old props go up to me and they say, ‘you’re right’. I’ve never had anyone, apart from a few South Africans – because it’s good for South Africa – say it’s rubbish.

It’s weird that “old props” are hanging around his front door and lobbying him, or maybe he just doesn’t “go out” much. Could it be that all of the hand-wringing about bench splits and scrummaging injuries is really a proxy for something else? Is it possible his issue is not about safety at all?


Well, that is what it seems. For me the truth is in this comment:

Can Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Australia and Argentina compete against South Africa, New Zealand and France if that’s the way the game goes? The answer to that is no.

So, this is the real issue for him. The Bomb Squad tactic is a really good one, and you have to be really good to play against it. Or you should try to de-power it by banning it, wailing about injuries that it supposedly causes (it doesn’t) and clutching at anecdotal straws to make your case.


The above quote is an insult to the five countries named, and it also suggests that no-one is going to be smart enough to come up with a game plan that neutralizes the bomb squad or turns it to a relative weakness. Williams is just a noisy fan looking to change the laws to favor his team and his personal tastes.


I agree with your conclusions. This Rassie approach is far from being unfair to backs. Not only does it favor fleet-footed and versatile “skills players” in the double-digit positions, but each individual gets more game time in any given match.


Whenever I go out I get exactly zero “old backs” coming up to me and complaining about the Bomb Squad tactic.


Bravo, Rassie.

191 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING South African rugby's top heavy house of cards South African rugby's house of cards
Search