Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Chiefs midfielder Johnny Fa'auli is a Hitman stuck in the wrong era

Johnny Fa’auli

Another dangerous tackle from Johnny Fa’auli, this time on Hurricanes midfielder Wes Goosen, sent the Hurricanes official twitter account into meltdown and head coach Chris Boyd into anger.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 22-year-old Chiefs enforcer is dealing with a growing rap sheet – his judiciary hearing tonight could add another suspension to the four weeks he received last year for a no-arms tackle against the Bulls.

The crackdown on high tackles and the issues surrounding concussions in the game is turning Johnny Fa’auli into something of an outlaw. Whilst this latest incident resulted in an ugly outcome, there are marginal differences between this tackle and the one he delivered two months earlier on Reds number 8 Caleb Timu, which was applauded by commentators at the time as ‘legal’ and ‘a good hit’.

Video Spacer

On Friday night against the Hurricanes, he led with the shoulder and made first contact with the head, leaving Goosen heavily concussed. Goosen, preparing for contact, crouched his body in an attempt to bump his opponent off, lowering his head into the firing line of Fa’auli’s trajectory. Such is the velocity of the game, split-second judgments can’t always be accurate. When multiple players are involved, the tackle area becomes a complex sum of moving parts, sometimes with adverse outcomes.

Video Spacer

Goosen’s decision to crouch into the tackle and attempt to win the collision unfortunately played as much a part as Fa’auli’s low-to-high tackle technique. If he stays upright and draws and passes, he may get hit late but contact with the head is avoidable.

“I mean, I don’t like to see a red card in any game, but red is red, and you don’t get a more obvious red card than that. That was shoulder, no arms, straight to the head, with force, with intent. There’s no butting out of any of that,” head coach Chris Boyd said after the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a deliberate act.”

The outcome of the tackle, under the rules, certainly justified the decision to hand Fa’auli a red card, however, it is overzealous to make claims of deliberate intent. Sure, he intended to make a big shot, maybe temporarily sting Goosen, but deliberate malicious intent to injure him with a concussion? Highly doubtful.

The moment he decides to launch, he loses sight of the target by tucking his head. His arm movement is questionable, often late to wrap but enough evidence is there that he is attempting a legal tackle. Never is the arm tucked inwards towards the chest like the traditional shoulder charge.

Fa’auli’s technique is fraught with risk but the payoff is big. The midfielder has a liking for a big shot that can set the tone for his side and swing momentum or cause a turnover.

If the onus is on the defender to account for any movement the ball carrier makes, including ducking or lowering of the torso then Fa’auli is guilty of that, and only that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both players were expecting the opposite of each other – Goosen, anticipating a low tackle, prepared to meet him low. Fa’auli sighting Goosen upright launched upward into his chest area. Both players misjudged the collision area, resulting in a sickening blow. As the defender, Fa’auli takes the blame, but it can’t be called deliberate.

The end result will likely be a second long suspension in two seasons, seeing him banned from playing in the opening rounds of 2019.

His tribulations mirror that of another dreadlocked 12 that also dealt with a fair share of criticism for his tackle technique at times – ex-All Black Ma’a Nonu. Who can forget the no-arms, blindside shoulder charge on Piri Weepu when he was at the Highlanders? That was real force, a league-style shoulder charge worthy of the NRL in the mid-noughties era.

Old school centre Brian Lima, also revered for his brutal tackling, was nicknamed the ‘Chiropractor’ for his back-breaking hits. A review of any of his ‘greatest’ hits will reveal far worse infringements than Fa’auli.

With the game becoming more aware of the long-term effects of concussions, he will have to shelve his launch approach or risk spending more time on the sidelines with more instances like these. When it comes off its’ a crowd pleaser and when it doesn’t the consequences are disastrous. And it is a few centimetres between both.

Johnny Fa’auli is a Hitman stuck in the wrong era.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search