Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Win or lose’: Chiefs No. 10 Damian McKenzie not the main focus for Reds

Damian McKenzie of the Chiefs is tackled by James O'Connor of the Reds during the Super Rugby Pacific Quarter Final match between Chiefs and Reds at FMG Stadium Waikato, on June 10, 2023, in Hamilton, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Reds coach Les Kiss may have described Chiefs playmaker Damian McKenzie as a “genius” on the rugby field, but the Queenslanders aren’t putting all their eggs in one basket by focusing intensely on the All Black.

ADVERTISEMENT

With an ability to break a game open from absolutely nothing, McKenzie is one of the most exciting players in Super Rugby Pacific. But the Reds understand the threat the Chiefs pose as a collective, and back their own ability as well.

After losing to the Hurricanes in a golden point thriller at Melbourne’s AAMI Park last weekend, the Reds will be eager to bounce back when they host the Chiefs in Brisbane on Saturday.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But to beat the Chiefs for the second time in less than 12 months, the Reds won’t be focusing on just one playmaking threat. It’s about them, not Damian McKenzie.

Reds co-captain Tate McDermott has insisted that the Queenslanders are focused on themselves ahead of the clash, saying defence will be the difference in Round Three.

“I think for us it’s just about staying connected,” McDermott told Reds media.

“We won’t be going after Damian… but for us, it’s about our defence (which) is going to win or lose this game and it’s front and centre this week.”

The Reds won their first match of the new Super Rugby Pacific season with a 40-22 win over arch-rivals the Waratahs in Brisbane before losing to the Hurricanes a week later.

ADVERTISEMENT

Showing plenty of fight against their favoured opponents, a try to co-captain McDermott helped the Reds take a 19-12 lead late in the first half during the fiercely contested clash.

Related

While the Hurricanes fought their way back, it was still a seesawing affair. Jordie Barrett was sent off with 25 minutes to play which made things interesting with the scores locked at 26-all.

In the end, it was decided after the end of 80 minutes, with the Canes winning a thriller by just five points. While they didn’t win, the Reds can take plenty of positives out of that match.

“I think it’s something that I’m proud of this team for, that we stuck in the fight,” McDermott said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We weren’t quite good enough to take those opportunities when they presented themselves last weekend but for us, it’s about also sticking in the fight but also trusting in the depth we’ve got this week.

“The boys coming in, they’ve trained really well. It’s been a short turnaround.

“Guys like Isaac Henry, guys like Mac Grealy coming back into the team, Jeff (Toomaga-Allen) there in the forwards – it’s exciting to see that those boys are eager to go and I can’t wait to go to battle with them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search