Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RWC 2027 qualifier: Card crazy game ends in Chile win

Chile's Luca Strabucchi takes on the Brazil defence in a South American qualifier for Rugby World Cup 2027. Photo: Paulina Silva @fotosspau/Chile Rugby

Chile have secured home advantage in the semi-finals of Sudamerica 2025 following a 36-10 win over Brazil in Estadio Municipal de La Pintana on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The teams will meet again in the semi-finals of Sudamerica 2025, with Los Cóndores once again having the benefit of playing in front of their own supporters.

Sudamerica 2025 serves as the region’s final qualification phase for Rugby World Cup 2027, and Chile and Brazil will take their place in the line-up along with Uruguay and the winner of this weekend’s play-off between Paraguay and Colombia.

Video Spacer

RWC 2027 expanding to 24 teams

World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin explains the thinking behind the expansion of RWC 2027 and the qualification process.

Video Spacer

RWC 2027 expanding to 24 teams

World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin explains the thinking behind the expansion of RWC 2027 and the qualification process.

The winner of Sudamerica 2025 will get an automatic ticket to the showpiece event in Australia, with the runner-up and third-placed team having further opportunities to get there, too.

For Sunday’s game, Chile had to make do without Rodrigo Fernández, Iñaki Ayarza and Diego Escobar, while Carlos Mignot, the Tupis’ new rising star, was required to play for his club, Biarritz.

It took Chile 14 minutes to score their first try of the game, with wing Nicolas Garafulic squeezing past the Brazilian defence to dot down the ball in the corner.

After 20 minutes, Brazil forced another penalty out of Chile and scored their first points of the game, thanks to the boot of Lucas Tranquez.

ADVERTISEMENT

With a few seconds to go to half-time, Chile turned up the pressure and boxed the Brazilians inside their 22. It ended up being a successful strategy as captain Martín Sigren crashed in for the second try of the game. Santiago Videla added the extras to give a nine-point lead to Chile.

Shortly after the break, the Cóndores immediately went searching for a third try, making the best out of their set-piece. From a five-metre scrum, number eight Alfonso Escobar picked up the ball and offloaded it to Garafulic, with the wing diving in for a brace.

In a 19-minute period of madness, there was a flurry of cards – Brazil received two yellows and a red, having already had one player sin-binned on the stroke of half-time. And briefly, it was 12 vs 14 as Chile also had a player yellow-carded, on 52 minutes.

Chile made their numerical supremacy count in the last 10 minutes, expanding their lead with two more converted tries, scored by prop Matías Duttis and substitute scrum-half Ernesto Tchimino. Brazil bagged a consolation try, thanks to an unstoppable carry from lock Gabriel Paganini.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
JW 75 days ago

Anyone know where this one can be watched? I assume theres a stream on WRs youtube or here on RP.

J
Jen 75 days ago

Five cards. Sounds like an intriguing game.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 53 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search