Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cipriani puts Gloucester speculation to bed by agreeing bumper contract

Gloucester out-half Danny Cipriani

After months of speculation that he could leave Gloucester despite having a contract only due to fully expire in summer 2020, Danny Cipriani has agreed a top-up deal that ensures he will definitely be playing for David Humphreys’ side next season. 

ADVERTISEMENT

It had been speculated that Bath and Bristol were both hot on the trail of the out-of-favour England out-half. However, the matter has at last finally been settled, Gloucester tweeting on Tuesday evening that their star playmaker has agreed to stay loyal and will continue togging out for the Premiership play-off chasing Cherry & Whites until at least 2022 following a three-year top-up.

The club had denied last month that Cipriani had a break clause in his current contract that would allow him to leave this summer. However, despite that denial, they have gone and splashed out to ensure he remains their player. 

RugbyPass reported last week that Cipriani’s current contract is worth in the region of £190,000 to £200,000, a relatively modest wage for an out-half of his calibre and experience. His new contract at Gloucester will potentially double that amount.

Cipriani signed a two-year deal in 2018 to join Gloucester, but the speculation that he could leave a year early forced head coach Johan Ackermann to confront these rumours a fortnight ago at his weekly media conference. 

“I’m not aware of any release clauses so, according to me, Danny is here with us for the 2019/20 season. Post that I’m not quite sure, that’s an ongoing process with the club and with Danny,” said the South African. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“When it comes to contracting, if the club feels they need to incorporate me and bring me in then I’ll get involved. But when it’s a financial decision it’s not me that must make the budget work. It’s up to the club to make that and that’s where the process is at the moment. It’s between Danny and the club for beyond next season.”

Cipriani is expected to explain his contract top-up in an in-house interview to be released by the club on Wednesday. 

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 8 hours ago
The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence

I think the argument behind the future of Rugby and defence vs attack is a pertinent one but also misses a big point. Rugby is a game about momentum and big swings of momentum makes games entertaining. You get and lose momentum in a few ways. You kick a 50-22 after defending for multiple phases (huge momentum swing), you get two penalties in a row thanks to bad opposition discipline allowing you to peel of large meters, you maintain large amounts of territory and possession tiring opponents out, you get a penalty from the set piece, a yellow or red card etc. The laws in the past years that have made the biggest impact has addressed stale games where no team can seize the momentum. The 50-22 has been a raging success as it allows huge momentum swings. The interpretations around ruck time and changes there to favour the team in possession has allowed sides like Ireland to wear teams down with possession-based play and maintain and build momentum. The Dupont law (which killed momentum) and now the reversing of it has had a huge impact and now the access interpretation of the laws around kick chases which forces teams and players to allow access to the catcher is set to make a big impact and everyone loves it because it allows a contest on the catch and more importantly could lead to huge swings in momentum. The worst laws have failed to allow teams to seize momentum. When rugby allowed teams to pass the ball back into the 22 and clear it was clearly a bad law as it allowed nobody to build momentum. Clearly the laws that changed several penalty offences around ruck and set piece to free kicks was aimed at speeding up the game but was a poor law because it killed momentum as teams would infringe regularly without major consequences from penalties and also it did not reward the team that made a big play to win possession from a penalizable offence. In the modern game you can win matches in many ways. You can dominate possession and territory like Ireland or play off counterattack and turnovers like France. You can dominate with the set piece and seize momentum that way like SA, or stifle teams with momentum killing defence. You can run strike moves off first and second phase and score in the blink of an eye like NZ. Every team with every style has a chance. World cup finals are all about ensuring that your opponent cannot seize momentum. Every team is so afraid to make mistakes that give away momentum that they play conservatively until they no longer can afford to. The game favours no style and no type of play and thats why the big 4 teams are so closely matched. In the end it all comes down to execution and the team that executes better wins. For my mind that is a well balanced game and it is on the right track.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence ‘I’m coming for you’: Byron McGuigan’s Mancunian malevolence
Search