Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cipriani takes issue with England dropping Marcus Smith again

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Danny Cipriani has expressed disappointment that Marcus Smith lost the England No10 shirt to Owen Farrell when Steve Borthwick confirmed his latest team at 5pm on Thursday. The wounded English are travelling to Dublin ahead of Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations finale versus the title-chasing Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pre-departure media reports all indicated that Farrell, who was benched last week against France, would be restored as the starting out-half, with Smith left stewing on the bench for the third time in the tournament. So it proved.

Smith started alongside Farrell in the opening round versus Scotland when head coach Borthwick continued the Eddie Jones tactic of playing the pair as a 10/12 combination. However, that gambit was scrapped after the defeat and Farrell started as the No10 versus Italy and Wales with Smith on the bench.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Those roles were reversed against France, Smith named as the starting out-half and Farrell among the replacements, but Borthwick’s latest rejig will now see Farrell start in Dublin with Smith back to providing bench cover.

It’s a development that Cipriani alleged told him more about rookie head coach Borthwick, who has struggled to impress, than Smith, who had been Jones’ number one out-half in the last year of his tenure.

Related

Writing in his latest Sportsmail column, Cipriani began: “I’m disappointed. I had been hoping that England would stick with Marcus Smith at 10 against Ireland but it looks like he is going to be dropped again. If he is left out, I don’t think it will damage him because he is a tough character.

“It would tell me more about Steve Borthwick than about Marcus. It could show that he is uncertain about what he is doing as a coach, or that he has a lack of compassion for individuals. That’s just how I view it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The right call would have been to give Marcus another chance. Borthwick made the decision last week to go with him, so I really thought he should be backed and given the next four or five games, leading up to the World Cup.

“Instead, Owen Farrell is coming back at 10, but we all know exactly how it’s going to look if either Farrell or George Ford start. Borthwick knows that too. Both are both very good players but for me, the ceiling is slightly higher with Marcus, so as the coach I would want to see what that looks like.

“If Borthwick drops him again, that’s more big headlines. The coaches can have a chat with Marcus and say: ‘We’re looking to go in this other direction because we feel it will suit the tactics’ – but you know exactly what the fanfare and the spin on it is going to be. You have got to be super confident as a coach that the player you are speaking to and leaving out can handle all that.

“It might make Marcus go back and play even better at his club. Any time there was any adversity or controversy around me, I’d get the bit between my teeth. I think he’s got that grit about him too. He feels a responsibility to bring people into rugby and help grow the game. The fact that he even thinks like that shows his heart and the fight he has got in him.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 18 minutes ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Very good, now we are getting somewhere (though you still didn't answer the question but as you're a South African I think we can all assume what the answer would be if you did lol)! Now let me ask you another question, and once you've answered that to yourself, you can ask yourself a followup question, to witch I'm intrigued to know the answer.


Well maybe more than a couple of questions, just to be clear. What exactly did this penalty stop you from doing the the first time that you want to try again? What was this offence that stopped you doing it? Then ask yourself how often would this occur in the game. Now, thinking about the regularity of it and compare it to how it was/would be used throughout the rest of the game (in cases other than the example you gave/didn't give for some unknown reason).


What sort of balance did you find?


Now, we don't want to complicate things further by bringing into the discussion points Bull raised like 'entirety' or 'replaced with a ruck', so instead I'll agree that if we use this article as a trigger to expanding our opinions/thoughts, why not allow a scrum to be reset if that is what they(you) want? Stopping the clock for it greatly removes the need to stop 5 minutes of scrum feeds happening. Fixing the law interpretations (not incorrectly rewarding the dominant team) and reducing the amount of offences that result in a penalty would greatly reduce the amount of repeat scrums in the first place. And now that refs a card happy, when a penalty offence is committed it's going to be far more likely it results in the loss of a player, then the loss of scrums completely and instead having a 15 on 13 advantage for the scrum dominant team to then run their opposition ragged. So why not take the scrum again (maybe you've already asked yourself that question by now)?


It will kind be like a Power Play in Hockey. Your outlook here is kind of going to depend on your understanding of what removing repeat scrums was put in place for, but I'm happy the need for it is gone in a new world order. As I've said on every discussion on this topic, scrums are great, it is just what they result in that hasn't been. Remove the real problem and scrum all you like. The All Blacks will love zapping that energy out of teams.

156 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Junior Kpoku: 'My goal is to fight for an England place at the 2027 World Cup.' Junior Kpoku: 'My goal is to fight for an England place at the 2027 World Cup.'
Search