Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Clash of the codes: a new future for young rugby stars

On Friday NZ Rugby and the New Zealand Warriors came to a surprisingly amicable agreement on the release of Etene Nanai-Seturo from league. The consequences for young players are far-reaching, writes James McOnie.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch some highlights of Etene Nanai-Seturo and it’s clear — he’s a slippery customer. Turns out he’s a slippery employee as well.

Like a flailing defender, the New Zealand Warriors couldn’t hang on to him, and on Friday Nanai-Seturo was set free — free to pursue a career in rugby.

The resolution was made via mediation between the Warriors and NZ Rugby.

But the shockwaves of that decision will be felt far and wide across rugby and rugby league. For Under-18 stars who’ve been convinced to sign a contract by a smooth-talking scout or agent, it shows there’s a way out. It’s not quite a precedent (it never went to court) — but it will act as a guide and an example for young players and their parents.

Contracts signed by a minor aren’t binding in New Zealand and that was NZ Rugby’s argument as they grabbed Nanai-Seturo from the Warriors and threw him straight into the All Blacks Sevens team in January.

With that selection, the soap opera began. Warriors CEO Cameron George labeled NZ Rugby “disrespectful” and vowed to fight them. “We are not going to get pushed around by anyone, especially in this kind of situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He was fired up. NZ Rugby’s Neil Sorensen responded: “We are definitely not walking all over anybody.”

All the while Nanai-Seturo (a star fullback for Auckland’s St Kentigern College First XV as recently as last year) went on to play his second Sevens World Series tournament for New Zealand, in Hamilton.

Then the warring parties went into mediation. At this stage I like to imagine a trained counsellor in a cardigan and sandals letting each person speak freely by using “I” language. “I feel… disrespected… [reaches for tissues] when you… take one of our players without asking nicely.” That kind of thing.

At 4.30pm on Friday afternoon a press release from NZ Rugby was emailed out, saying Nanai-Seturo had left the Warriors. Oh dear. Surely George would be fuming. Here’s what the release said:

ADVERTISEMENT

Warriors CEO Cameron George welcomed the agreement and said he was looking forward to continuing to have a productive relationship with New Zealand Rugby. “We need to work together when faced with these situations and it is not in either of our interests for these matters to be aired in public,” he said. “The Vodafone Warriors wish Etene well with his career.”

Ummm OK. This doesn’t help the soap opera script at all but the mediator will be so proud of the progress Cameron has made.

While the terms of the agreement are confidential, it’s understood the NRL club was paid a fee to ensure the code switch. Nanai-Seturo, 18, will hope to make the Commonwealth Games sevens team and play Super Rugby with the Chiefs.

The Nanai-Seturo case will be quoted for years to come and it could open the floodgates for teenagers to switch codes either way. Some at NZ Rugby wanted to go to court, to test the law and set a precedent.

So what will change?

Well, you will still find agents and scouts from both codes at school rugby and league fields every Saturday. They will still do their best Jerry Maguire impression, charming the pants off the parents and convincing them that their club/agency will look after their boy. And some scouts will still aggressively target families that could really use money.

While these scouts pat themselves on the back for discovering a player, what needs to be said is everyone watching the game can see the player’s potential as well. It’s obvious. The coaches know, the other parents know, the school kids know. These athletes are supremely talented — they’re on the conveyor belt to stardom — so when a scout decides to throw some money at them, they’re merely formalising what everyone else sees.

The issue is the age that players are being signed. Some at just 14 or 15 years old. Nanai-Seturo was 15.

It’s said that NRL scouts like to get in early. When the Crusaders approached towering forward Nelson Asofa-Solomona when he was in the Wellington College first XV, he had already been contracted to the Melbourne Storm for two years. And it’s worked out for him.

Some switches happen without too much drama. Ngani Laumape was snapped up by the Warriors as a youngster but returned to rugby union. Nehe Milner-Skudder was with the Sydney Bulldogs under-20s in 2009/10 but came back to star in the 2015 Rugby World Cup.

Now, the Nanai-Seturo saga serves as a warning and a template to any parents of young footy stars. Their child’s ambitions at 15 and at 18 may vary. And the law is there to protect them.

So if an agent dazzles you with the promise of riches, just remember that’s what they always do. These people are experienced deal-makers and their spiel is well-rehearsed.

Your next move should be to get independent legal advice. Someone in your family might have a contact. The NZ Law Society and Auckland District Law Society websites will help you find a lawyer — on the latter you can search under ‘sports lawyer’ and it reveals 124 in Auckland alone, and 100 outside of Auckland.

If you can’t afford legal advice, contact the school principal. More often than not, your child has been approached while representing that school. It’s the school’s problem too. Or contact your nearest Citizen’s Advice Bureau — they offer free legal advice.

I’m sorry this column has ended up as instructional. But if you’re a child star or the parents of one, you know what to do: Lawyer up!

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search