Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Classement final pour le tirage au sort de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby Féminin 2025

DUBAI, ÉMIRATS ARABES UNIS - 12 OCTOBRE : Les joueuses de l'Espagne célèbrent leur qualification pour la Coupe du monde 2025 après la victoire de l'équipe lors du match WXV 3 2024 entre les Fidji et l'Espagne au stade The Sevens 2, le 12 octobre 2024 à Dubaï, aux Émirats arabes unis. (Photo par Christopher Pike - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

L’Angleterre, le Canada, la Nouvelle-Zélande et la France se sont qualifiées parmi les équipes de tête pour le tirage au sort de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby féminin 2025. L’événement sera diffusé en direct sur RugbyPass TV à partir de 19h20 (GMT+1).

ADVERTISEMENT

L’Angleterre, après avoir remporté pour la deuxième fois consécutive le WXV 1 en battant le Canada 21-12, aborde le tirage au sort de la Coupe du Monde de Rugby féminin 2025 comme l’équipe la mieux classée de tous les temps, hommes et femmes confondus.

Sous la direction de John Mitchell, l’équipe a enchaîné 20 victoires consécutives, atteignant un score record de 97,56 points depuis la création du classement World Rugby en 2003.

La France reste 4e mondiale

Le Canada, pays hôte du WXV 1, est en deuxième position, suivi de la Nouvelle-Zélande et de la France, quatrième.

Video Spacer

Watch the best tries of WXV 2023

Video Spacer

Watch the best tries of WXV 2023

L’Australie, nouvelle championne du WXV 2, rejoint le chapeau 2 avec l’Irlande, l’Écosse et l’Italie. Les Wallaroos ont pris la place de l’Écosse après les avoir battus 31-22 lors du match décisif pour le titre au Cap.

De son côté, l’Italie a également accédé au chapeau 2 grâce à une victoire 23-19 contre l’Afrique du Sud, prenant la place des États-Unis, désormais dans le chapeau 3 avec le Pays de Galles, le Japon et l’Afrique du Sud.

L’Espagne, victorieuse du WXV 3 en 2024, est à la tête du chapeau 4, accompagnée des Samoa, des Fidji et du Brésil, l’équipe la moins bien classée du tirage.

Le tirage au sort répartira les quatre meilleures équipes dans le chapeau 1, occupant la première place de chaque poule, tandis que les autres équipes seront distribuées dans les chapeaux 2, 3 et 4 en fonction de leur classement.

Composition des chapeaux pour le tirage au sort de la WRWC 2025 (classement entre parenthèses)

  • Chapeau 1 : Angleterre (1er), Canada (2e), Nouvelle-Zélande (3e), France (4e)
  • Chapeau 2 : Australie (5e), Irlande (6e), Ecosse (7e), Italie (8e)
  • Chapeau 3 : USA (9e), Pays de Galles (10e), Japon (11e), Afrique du Sud (12e)
  • Chapeau 4 : Espagne (13e), Samoa (15e), Fidji (17e), Brésil (42e)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search