Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Clermont and FFR issue statements after Mohamed Haouas' conviction

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

French prop Mohamed Haouas has been told he will never wear the shirt of his new club Clermont, while he also faces the chop from the France national team squad ahead of the Rugby World Cup. Having finished the 2022/23 season with Montpellier, the 29-year-old was set to take up a three-year contract at Top 14 rivals Clermont.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, that deal has now been binned after it emerged on Tuesday that Haouas was handed a one-year jail sentence on Tuesday for hitting his wife in public. The 16-cap France player told a court he had lost control when he saw his wife smoking at the shopping centre where she worked, after telling him she had given up.

“She has the right to smoke… but the problem is that she lied to me… and I said to myself that if she can lie about the cigarette, she could lie about other things,” he told the court in Montpellier.

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

How referees and coaches are collaborating for the World Cup | The Breakdown

The court did not follow the recommendations of the prosecution, who had called for the prop to face 18 months in prison, beginning immediately. Instead, Haouas will remain free while he launches an appeal, or he could wear an electronic tag.

One thing that appears certain is that Haouas won’t be playing for Clermont in 2023/24. A statement read: “The court has just rendered its decision in the domestic violence case concerning Mohamed Haouas. At the end of this sentence, he has, like the Public Prosecutor’s Office, 10 days to possibly appeal.

Related

“The charges against Mohamed Haouas, which he has acknowledged, are unacceptable. Beyond the ethics advocated by our sport and as recalled by the minister delegate Amelie Oudea-Castera, they are totally incompatible with the respect and values taught and cultivated within the ASM, from the rugby school to the professional team.

“By his behavior, Mohamed Haouas puts himself in total opposition to our identity and our convictions, and in the state of the elements we have, he will not be able to wear, on the field, the colours of our club.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, an FFR statement stated that Fabien Galthie will speak about the Haouas situation at a press briefing on June 7. “We express our dismay at this situation and condemn in the strongest terms all forms of violence, especially violence against women.

“Mohammed Haouas’ behaviour is unacceptable and incompatible with the representation of our nation at the international level,” read the statement.

“The staff of the XV de France will speak on June 7 at the press conference of the coach and the general manager initially planned.”

Vice-president Serge Simon said: “Mohammed Haouas’ conduct is contrary to the principles that underpin our sport and our national team. Being a member of the France team implies an irreproachable respect for the values of respect and integrity. Firmness is our duty in such circumstances.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search