Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Clinical patience meets creative brutality in PNC third-place final

Melani Matavao of Samoa and Nate Augspurger of the USA. Photo by Toru Hanai - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images and Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images

Why You Should Care

The bronze medal match of any tournament can always feel like a bit of a let-down– two teams coming off well-fought semi-finals trying to find motivation to play for a consolation prize. However, the USA v Samoa matchup brings some extra spice that might be missing from a different pairing. Having only met twice since 2018, USA has surprisingly won the last two meetings, including a last-minute conversion in 2018 and a gritty, muddy match in the 2019 Pacific Nations Cup. The matchup between a young Eagles starting to find their identity and the always dangerous Samoa with a chip on their shoulder promises an encounter to remember.

ADVERTISEMENT

Samoa come off of a 49-27 loss to Japan, where they were outclassed early and could not catch up to a well-oiled Japanese machine. Samoa’s tries came off of explosive broken and individual plays, living up to their reputation for brutal and creative rugby. However, their disconnected form also let them down, presenting broken fronts that Japan exploited clinically. Their size advantage never materialized in any form of consistent edge.

USA fell to Fiji 22-3 in a match that showcased the depth of the fight in the Eagles’ defence, but also revealed the shakiness of USA’s finishing ability. Holding the potent Fiji attack to 3 tries speaks for itself, especially as they entered the USA 22m on 10 occasions. In set piece, they shored up their maul defence and were also able to win 3 scrum penalties. However, the fact remains that the Eagles only managed to score a single penalty, despite 7 entries to the Fijian 22m, including two 5m lineouts. While the squad rotation might explain some of the shaky connections, the basics of lineouts and tight attack should not suffer for it.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Why Samoa Will Win

Despite their heavy loss to Fiji, Samoa play a similar style to their island neighbours, particularly in the ways that have given USA trouble in the PNC. They thrive on broken play, especially counter-attacks on poorly executed kicks. The hot, slick conditions of Japan haven’t seemed to have dampened their skills the way others have struggled, and the tries they scored against Japan showed the brilliance of which they are capable. Hard-running wingers can create deep bends in the defence which allow their forwards to build heads of steam and become nigh unstoppable through the middle of the field.

Despite USA’s improved maul defence, Samoa brings no shortage of size and brutality in their forward pack, and any regression in form will see Samoa bully that part of the game. In the scrum, injuries in the USA camp mean that they have a new cap on the bench in loosehead Payton Telea, and recently capped tighthead Pono Davis. Any scrum trouble early will not have any veteran presence coming off the bench to shore things up, and could lead to painful penalty troubles for the Eagles.

Fixture
Pacific Nations Cup
Samoa
18 - 13
Full-time
USA
All Stats and Data

Why USA Will Win

In their match against Fiji, USA built on their strong tackling in tight with an improved rush defence in the outside backs. Fiji’s potent attack faltered in the face of American line speed, and their forwards were unable to break the gainline with brute force. Concerns about Fiji’s offload game never materialized, and except for two lapses USA held the line. Samoa bring a similar but less practised form of the Fijian attack, so the Eagles should confidently shut down any outside threats.

On attack, USA has brought Luke Carty back in at flyhalf, meaning his devastating kicking game will once again challenge the opposition backfield. Consistently turning the Samoa back three and preventing any promising counter-attack will stymie a main source of scoring. In addition, a dominant kicking game provides even more opportunities for a strong defence to create turnover ball, from which the USA has shown an ability to create scoring threats. If they’re able to shore up their lineout performance from last week, they’ve shown good creativity in the driving maul to get around Samoa’s size advantage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Why Anyone Can Win

Both teams will have the opportunity to seize this match and make it their own– Samoa through creative attack and physical brutality, USA through clinical defence and patient attack. While Samoa can certainly score from anywhere, neither team will run away with this early and the match will come down to the final twenty minutes. Don’t underestimate the motivation factor here either– USA will want to show they can consistently compete and win against these almost-Tier 1 teams, while Samoa will want to comprehensively put away a team five places behind them in the rankings.

I’m picking the Eagles to win a tight one, on the back of Carty’s boot and Cory Daniel’s shoulders. 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 24 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search