Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Clinical patience meets creative brutality in PNC third-place final

Melani Matavao of Samoa and Nate Augspurger of the USA. Photo by Toru Hanai - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images and Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images

Why You Should Care

The bronze medal match of any tournament can always feel like a bit of a let-down– two teams coming off well-fought semi-finals trying to find motivation to play for a consolation prize. However, the USA v Samoa matchup brings some extra spice that might be missing from a different pairing. Having only met twice since 2018, USA has surprisingly won the last two meetings, including a last-minute conversion in 2018 and a gritty, muddy match in the 2019 Pacific Nations Cup. The matchup between a young Eagles starting to find their identity and the always dangerous Samoa with a chip on their shoulder promises an encounter to remember.

ADVERTISEMENT

Samoa come off of a 49-27 loss to Japan, where they were outclassed early and could not catch up to a well-oiled Japanese machine. Samoa’s tries came off of explosive broken and individual plays, living up to their reputation for brutal and creative rugby. However, their disconnected form also let them down, presenting broken fronts that Japan exploited clinically. Their size advantage never materialized in any form of consistent edge.

USA fell to Fiji 22-3 in a match that showcased the depth of the fight in the Eagles’ defence, but also revealed the shakiness of USA’s finishing ability. Holding the potent Fiji attack to 3 tries speaks for itself, especially as they entered the USA 22m on 10 occasions. In set piece, they shored up their maul defence and were also able to win 3 scrum penalties. However, the fact remains that the Eagles only managed to score a single penalty, despite 7 entries to the Fijian 22m, including two 5m lineouts. While the squad rotation might explain some of the shaky connections, the basics of lineouts and tight attack should not suffer for it.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Why Samoa Will Win

Despite their heavy loss to Fiji, Samoa play a similar style to their island neighbours, particularly in the ways that have given USA trouble in the PNC. They thrive on broken play, especially counter-attacks on poorly executed kicks. The hot, slick conditions of Japan haven’t seemed to have dampened their skills the way others have struggled, and the tries they scored against Japan showed the brilliance of which they are capable. Hard-running wingers can create deep bends in the defence which allow their forwards to build heads of steam and become nigh unstoppable through the middle of the field.

Despite USA’s improved maul defence, Samoa brings no shortage of size and brutality in their forward pack, and any regression in form will see Samoa bully that part of the game. In the scrum, injuries in the USA camp mean that they have a new cap on the bench in loosehead Payton Telea, and recently capped tighthead Pono Davis. Any scrum trouble early will not have any veteran presence coming off the bench to shore things up, and could lead to painful penalty troubles for the Eagles.

Fixture
Pacific Nations Cup
Samoa
18 - 13
Full-time
USA
All Stats and Data

Why USA Will Win

In their match against Fiji, USA built on their strong tackling in tight with an improved rush defence in the outside backs. Fiji’s potent attack faltered in the face of American line speed, and their forwards were unable to break the gainline with brute force. Concerns about Fiji’s offload game never materialized, and except for two lapses USA held the line. Samoa bring a similar but less practised form of the Fijian attack, so the Eagles should confidently shut down any outside threats.

On attack, USA has brought Luke Carty back in at flyhalf, meaning his devastating kicking game will once again challenge the opposition backfield. Consistently turning the Samoa back three and preventing any promising counter-attack will stymie a main source of scoring. In addition, a dominant kicking game provides even more opportunities for a strong defence to create turnover ball, from which the USA has shown an ability to create scoring threats. If they’re able to shore up their lineout performance from last week, they’ve shown good creativity in the driving maul to get around Samoa’s size advantage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Why Anyone Can Win

Both teams will have the opportunity to seize this match and make it their own– Samoa through creative attack and physical brutality, USA through clinical defence and patient attack. While Samoa can certainly score from anywhere, neither team will run away with this early and the match will come down to the final twenty minutes. Don’t underestimate the motivation factor here either– USA will want to show they can consistently compete and win against these almost-Tier 1 teams, while Samoa will want to comprehensively put away a team five places behind them in the rankings.

I’m picking the Eagles to win a tight one, on the back of Carty’s boot and Cory Daniel’s shoulders. 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search