Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Woodward praises axing of Owen Farrell just 2 days after backing him for RWC

England skipper Owen Farrell (Photo by Adam Davy/PA Images via Getty Images)

World Cup-winning coach Sir Clive Woodward has backed the sensational dropping of England flyhalf Owen Farrell for their Guinness Six Nations match with France in favour of Marcus Smith – a call which has been flagged in reports out of the UK this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the team is yet to be named, according to reports, Borthwick has made the bold decision to drop Farrell and instead choose the Harlequins maverick for Le Crunch, a move which comes as England struggle to find their rhythm this season.

The 24-year-old Smith has been in exceptional form for his club Harlequins, leading them to their first Premiership title in 2021, form which he has taken into the 2022/23 season. His selection brings a fresh perspective to England’s game, and many believe his attacking flair and creativity will be crucial in unlocking the French defence in Twickenham.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Although it’s a risky move to drop a player of Farrell’s calibre, Borthwick’s decision is a clear statement that no one is safe from being dropped if they are not performing up to standards. It also signals a shift towards a more dynamic and exciting brand of rugby.

Woodward is full of praise for Borthwick’s call, saying that sometimes coaches must go with their ‘gut instinct’.

“We’ve all dropped big players,” Woodward told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “You have got to make those calls. It’s still early days for Steve and, if you are going to make these big calls to try to find out your best starting team, you need to make them early in your career.

“I was looking forward to the game anyway, but even more so now that Smith starts at 10.”

His comments are a surprise given he wrote that Owen Farrell is the man that can win the Rugby World Cup for England in seven months’ time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Writing in his Daily Mail column just two days ago, Woodward wrote: “For the good of England’s progression, Borthwick needs to nail his colours to the mast in terms of who he picks at fly-half. Some might say he has already done so by naming Farrell as captain for this Six Nations and picking him ahead of Smith for the games against Italy and Wales. Today, my choice would be Farrell, too.”

Related

England face a formidable French side at Twickenham, and the pressure is on for Smith to deliver. Borthwick’s faith in the young flyhalf could prove to be the spark that England needs to turn their fortunes around in this Six Nations campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Let's be real about these All Blacks Let's be real about these All Blacks
Search