Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

England head coach Steve Borthwick during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between England and Ireland at Twickenham Stadium in London, England. (Photo By David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former England head coach Clive Woodward has sharply criticized Steve Borthwick’s decisions during England’s 24-22 loss to New Zealand, calling his substitution strategy “criminal” in a scathing column.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borthwick is under fire for a number of bizarrely timed substitutions, most notably that of George Ford for Marcus Smith. Ford went on to have a shocker, missing a try-saving tackle on Mark Telea and two kickable chances to win the game in the dying moments.

A fuming Woodward wrote: “England’s latest defeat by New Zealand left me genuinely angry. Steve Borthwick’s methods must be questioned because the game was there for the taking.”

England held a promising 22-14 lead at the 60-minute mark when Borthwick made “premeditated substitutions,” removing key players Ben Spencer, Marcus Smith, and Chandler Cunningham-South, despite their strong performances. “It was absolute madness,” Woodward wrote, “Not only was that trio standing out in an error-strewn yet titanic game, but they were also not fatigued in any way, shape or form.”

Woodward described Smith’s reaction on the bench: “When Smith sat down, he almost looked around and shrugged his shoulders as if to say ‘Is that it? Is that me done?’” He argued that England, with an eight-point lead, should have pressed on instead of attempting to contain New Zealand.

Labelling the tactic as “a criminal and decisive mistake,” Woodward slammed Borthwick’s apparent reliance on pre-planned replacements. “In international rugby, you cannot simply contain an opponent and look to hang on to your advantage. You have to earn the victory for the full 80 minutes.”

He also questioned the impact of replacements Harry Randall and the aforementioned Ford: “When Ford came on, he was waving his hands and urging the team to calm down… the message was, ‘We’re going to hold on to this now’ rather than ‘We’re going to continue to play and win the game.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward called for the need for adaptability over rigid planning, writing: “International coaching cannot be — and will never be — about premeditated replacements.”

He called on England’s management to address these issues swiftly, urging that “this pain should hurt, and hurt for a very long time, predominantly because defeat was totally avoidable and of their own making.”

Related

Watch the highly acclaimed five-part documentary Chasing the Sun 2, chronicling the journey of the Springboks as they strive to successfully defend the Rugby World Cup, free on RugbyPass TV (*unavailable in Africa)

ADVERTISEMENT

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
F
Flankly 162 days ago

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

G
GG 163 days ago

Who is Clive Woodward? Is he the Spurs coach?

H
Head high tackle 163 days ago

I think he hosts a TV show. Maybe thats Clive Robertson...

R
RW 163 days ago

Trying a bomb squad but... LOL

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 46 minutes ago
Why the Brumbies are still the best team in Australia

It is honestly a disgraceful statistic that the reds have not taken a single 3 pointer this season when you consider statistics its hard to believe that. Lets do the maths quickly, you have a penalty from 40 out thats an 80% chance (conservative) for your kicker to get 3 because its in front. Easy come, easy go, you get those 3 points 80% of the time for 2.4 points on average per kick. Even if you dont nail it you start with territory as now its a 22 drop out so you can bring the ball back again. Now instead of taking an obvious 3 you kick to the corner from 40 out. You get the mall 5m out maybe 10% of the time, you get it 10-15m out maybe 50% of the time and 35% of the time your kicker knocks it between 22-15m out. Now stats show when you get a lineout 5m out you score maybe 50-60%% of the time but if you have an incredible mall and you are top of the pile this stat rises to something like 70-80% of the time take Glasgow and Leinster in URC or the Springboks for example. If you are 10m out your likelihood of scoring drops dramatically. Like 60% becomes 20% for example and this is just to get 5 points mind you, there is a 30-40%% chance you will not even add the 2 to make it a 7 pointer. So which is easier and better for you? Sure the game situation matters. If you are trailing by 15 the 3 may not be wise but the Reds have won 5 of their 8 matches this year and are a good team. They have plenty of chances to take the 3 in situations where its easier and logical to do so than going for the try. They have been involved in 3 games that finished with just 1 score between the sides. There have been plenty of opportunities to take 3 they just don’t care for it. No side in Rugby has ever won anything substantial this way. The Reds would do well to remember that and also remember that they will never usurp the Brumbies while they refuse to add a douse of pragmatism to their flair.

10 Go to comments
L
Logan Savannah 59 minutes ago
'We’re ready to fight' - Championship boss sets promotion goal

I read somewhere while at work on the internet in X that the Bitcoin lost during the Bit get breach, worth more than $5 million, has been fully recovered, thanks to the efforts of Tech Cyber Force Recovery. The breach had left many users devastated, unsure if they would ever see their funds again. However, Tech Cyber Force Recovery stepped in and successfully traced and retrieved the stolen Bitcoin, ensuring that all affected users received 100% of their lost assets. The recovery process was far from easy. The Tech Cyber Force Recovery team used cutting-edge blockchain forensic techniques to track down the stolen funds. They meticulously followed the transaction trail across multiple blockchain networks, piecing together the complex puzzle of the breach. It involved collaboration with cybersecurity experts and relevant authorities to ensure that the recovery was not only successful but also secure. The recovery efforts were particularly significant because the total value of the Bitcoin lost during the Bit get breach amounted to over $5 million. This made the task even more critical, as the amount at stake was substantial. Users who had once feared losing their investments can now rest easy, knowing that Tech Cyber Force Recovery was able to restore their assets in full. What sets Tech Cyber Force Recovery apart is not just its technical expertise but also its commitment to transparency. Throughout the entire recovery process, the team kept users informed every step of the way. This communication was crucial in maintaining trust and confidence. Many of the affected Bit get users expressed their gratitude toward Tech Cyber Force Recovery, acknowledging the team’s dedication to ensuring the recovery of their funds. In an era where digital asset security is a growing concern, this recovery serves as an important reminder of the role that blockchain forensics and recovery services play in protecting users. It also underscores the importance of having a trusted service like Tech Cyber Force Recovery available to assist in cases of breaches and theft. Their success in recovering the stolen Bitcoin, worth over $5 million, has made them a beacon of hope for users who might otherwise have lost everything. VISIT THE TEAMS ON WhatsApp +.(156)(172)(636)(97) OR TELEGRAM (AT)TECHCYBERFORC  With the full recovery of the funds, users can now feel more secure about the safety of their digital assets, knowing that there are reliable and capable services like Tech Cyber Force Recovery to help when things go wrong.

0 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Zarn Sullivan starts, captain's brother could debut in Blues team with a twist Zarn Sullivan to make season debut for Blues
Search