Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

England head coach Steve Borthwick during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between England and Ireland at Twickenham Stadium in London, England. (Photo By David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former England head coach Clive Woodward has sharply criticized Steve Borthwick’s decisions during England’s 24-22 loss to New Zealand, calling his substitution strategy “criminal” in a scathing column.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borthwick is under fire for a number of bizarrely timed substitutions, most notably that of George Ford for Marcus Smith. Ford went on to have a shocker, missing a try-saving tackle on Mark Telea and two kickable chances to win the game in the dying moments.

A fuming Woodward wrote: “England’s latest defeat by New Zealand left me genuinely angry. Steve Borthwick’s methods must be questioned because the game was there for the taking.”

England held a promising 22-14 lead at the 60-minute mark when Borthwick made “premeditated substitutions,” removing key players Ben Spencer, Marcus Smith, and Chandler Cunningham-South, despite their strong performances. “It was absolute madness,” Woodward wrote, “Not only was that trio standing out in an error-strewn yet titanic game, but they were also not fatigued in any way, shape or form.”

Woodward described Smith’s reaction on the bench: “When Smith sat down, he almost looked around and shrugged his shoulders as if to say ‘Is that it? Is that me done?’” He argued that England, with an eight-point lead, should have pressed on instead of attempting to contain New Zealand.

Labelling the tactic as “a criminal and decisive mistake,” Woodward slammed Borthwick’s apparent reliance on pre-planned replacements. “In international rugby, you cannot simply contain an opponent and look to hang on to your advantage. You have to earn the victory for the full 80 minutes.”

He also questioned the impact of replacements Harry Randall and the aforementioned Ford: “When Ford came on, he was waving his hands and urging the team to calm down… the message was, ‘We’re going to hold on to this now’ rather than ‘We’re going to continue to play and win the game.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward called for the need for adaptability over rigid planning, writing: “International coaching cannot be — and will never be — about premeditated replacements.”

He called on England’s management to address these issues swiftly, urging that “this pain should hurt, and hurt for a very long time, predominantly because defeat was totally avoidable and of their own making.”

Related

Watch the highly acclaimed five-part documentary Chasing the Sun 2, chronicling the journey of the Springboks as they strive to successfully defend the Rugby World Cup, free on RugbyPass TV (*unavailable in Africa)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
F
Flankly 60 days ago

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

G
GG 61 days ago

Who is Clive Woodward? Is he the Spurs coach?

H
Head high tackle 60 days ago

I think he hosts a TV show. Maybe thats Clive Robertson...

R
RW 61 days ago

Trying a bomb squad but... LOL

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 9 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

on the article "Why defensive aggressor Felix Jones will drive new-look England" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s games under Borthwick:

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

Fiji 30:100

Ireland 21:100

Wales 24:100

Wales 13:100

Ireland 26:100

France 22:100

Wales 26:100

Italy 23:100

Scotland 18:100

The average is 27:100

The average in games we have won is 28:100

The average in games we have lost is 26:100, but these averages are skewed by the fact that we have tended to kick less and pass more against worse sides

The average in games where we have beaten current top 10 sides is 35:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 8 sides is 39:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 7 sides is 53:100

The average in games where we have lost to teams currently ranked lower than us is 20:100"


on the article "Four talking points after England's narrowest-ever win over Italy" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s last 8 games

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

So (1) England spread it wide more yesterday than against anyone bar Chile, and (2) all of england’s best performances have been when we kick loads, and in every match where we kick loads we have had a good performance."


"In particular you're neglecting the impact of the type of D Felix Jones was trying to introduce, which demanded most of England's training energy at the time."


I'm not, actually, I'm hyper aware of that fact and of its impact. I think it is because of the defence that England's new attack faltered so much for the first three games, something you ignore when you try to judge England's attack in the six nations by taking an average of either the trys scored or the rucks completed over the whole tournament.


"International coaches don't just pick those styles like sweets from a sweet shop!"

Yeah, I know. England's defence wasn't exactly the same as SA's, but it was similar. England's attack did rely on turnovers more than the Irish system did, but it was still pretty similar to it, and then shifted to something similar-but-not-identitcal to the Labit/Nick Evans systems, which are themselves similar but not identical.

102 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

"So who were these 6 teams and circumstances of Marcus's loses?"


so in the 2023 six nations, England lost both games where Marcus started at 10, which was the games against Scotland and France. The scotland game was poor, but spirited, and the french game was maybe the worst math england have played in almost 30 years. In all 3 games where Marcus didn't start England were pretty good.


The next game he started after that was the loss against Wales in the RWC warmups, which is one of only three games Borthwick has lost against teams currently ranked lower than england.


The next game he's started have been the last 7, so that's two wins against Japan, three losses against NZ, a loss to SA, and a loss to Australia (again, one of borthwicks only losses to teams ranked lower than england).


"I think I understand were you're coming from, and you make a good observation that the 10 has a fair bit to do with how fast a side can play (though what you said was a 'Marcus neutral' statement)"


no, it wasn't a marcus neutral statement.


"Fin could be, but as you've said with Marcus, that would require a lot of change elsewhere in the team 2 years out of a WC"


how? what? why? Fin could slot in easily; its Marcus who requires the team to change around him.


"Marcus will get a 6N to prove himself so to speak"


yes, the 2022 six nations, which was a disaster, just as its been a disaster every other time he's been given the reigns.

224 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market
Search