Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Close to perfection: Johann van Graan's favourite game

Bath finished eighth in Van Graan's first season but haven't been out of the top four since (Photo Patrick Khachfe/Getty Images)

For anyone associated with Bath Rugby, Christmas presents don’t get much better than Saturday’s 68-10 demolition of Saracens.

ADVERTISEMENT

A record win and 10 tries scored against one of the English game’s powerhouses ensured there was plenty of festive cheer by the banks of the River Avon.

It may be a new contender for Johann van Graan’s list of favourite performances he’s been involved in as a coach, but for now, the Bulls’ epic 61-17 win over the Chiefs in the 2009 Super Rugby final in Pretoria gets his vote.

When the YouTube highlights reel is 48 minutes long, you know it must be a classic, and van Graan lived the match for real as a young coach on the winning team.

The respective teams were captained by Victor Matfield and Mils Muliaina and the two XVs were littered with Springboks and All Blacks, and it didn’t take long for the match to ignite.

Stephen Donald, in the form of his life and showing pace that was never apparent during his time as a Bath player, set up the opening try for Lelia Masaga with a blindside burst as the Chiefs stunned the 55,000 crowd at Loftus Versfeld by taking a 7-0 lead in the seventh minute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having been temporarily silenced, the Bulls faithful were back on their feet two minutes later to applaud Fourie du Preez’s try from a tap penalty, which prompted an avalanche of points, in one direction.

Du Preez scored a second and then set up Bryan Habana as the crowd sensed something special was brewing. Habana then ran in an intercept to match du Preez in bagging a double, while the metronomic boot of Morne Steyn inflicted further damage on the scoreboard.

Turning around 31-7 in arrears, the Chiefs hit back with a classy score from Muliaina. But that only proved to be the cue for the Bulls to go on the rampage again, as four more clinical tries followed from Matfield, Wynand Olivier, Pierre Spies and Danie Rossouw.

“I always think back to that game at a full Loftus, that day was the closest to perfection that I’ve been a part of a team,” recalled van Graan.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That was a special group of players and it, literally, came from 2002. We’d had seven years together and it was our second Super Rugby final.”

The Bulls successfully defended their Super Rugby crown in 2010 and two years later, van Graan landed a job on the Springbok management team.

After six years in Test rugby, van Graan moved to Munster and then Bath. Whilst he failed to revive Munster’s fortunes, van Graan is now threatening to restore Bath to their place at the top of the English game.

But the search for perfection goes on.

Related

Watch the highly acclaimed five-part documentary Chasing the Sun 2, chronicling the journey of the Springboks as they strive to successfully defend the Rugby World Cup, free on RugbyPass TV (*unavailable in Africa)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

Of course not, but were not going to base our reasoning on what is said in one comment in a particular scenario and time, are we?


Actually, you are? Seriously?

Although Burke readily admits “I am driven by international rugby”, his final destination is still unknown. He could be one day replacing Finn Russell in the navy blue of Scotland, or challenging Marcus Smith for the right to wear a red rose on his chest, or cycling all the way home to the silver fern. It is all ‘Professor Plum in the billiards room with the lead pipe’ type guesswork, as things stand.

You yourself suggested it? Just theoretically? Look I hope Burke does well, but he's not really a player that has got a lot of attention, you've probably read/heard more him in this last few months than we have in his 4 years. Your own comments also suggest going overseas is a good idea to push ones case for national selection, especially for a team like NZ being so isolated. So i'll ask again, as no of your quotes obviously say one thing or the other, why don't you think he might be trying to advance his case like Leicester did?


Also, you can look at Leicesters statements in a similar fashion, where no doubt you are referring to his comments made while in NZ (still playing a big part of the WC campaign in his case). You should be no means have taken them for granted, and I'd suggest any other coach or management and he might not have returned (been wanted back).

126 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

As Razor should be, he is the All Black coach after all. Borthwick or Schmidt, not so much. The point I was trying to make is that people are comparing Razors first year (14 games) versus Fosters first 14 games, which were over two years and happened to conclude just before he lost all of his EOYT games (Ireland, France, England etc). Not to mention them being COVID level opponents.


So who were these 6 teams and circumstances of Marcus's loses? I had just written that sentence as a draft and it was still there after adding the prior sentence, so just left it there lol. So not bullying no, but left essentially to say 'i'm not going to find out of myself', yes. I thought I had already proved the need for that sort of requirement with the Razor reference. So as per above, there would be a lot of context to take out of those 14 games (those shared between Farrell Ford and Smith) against higher opponents. It's a good stat/way to highlight the your point, but all a stat like that really does is show you theres something to investigate. Had you done this investigation prior to coming to your realisation, or after?


Yes, my view is that England did very well to push New Zealand on multiple occasions, and Marcus specifically in keeping England in the game against Australia. Personally I think Englands results are more down to luck however. And as I said, I'm here to be swayed, not defend Marcus as the #1. I think I understand were you're coming from, and you make a good observation that the 10 has a fair bit to do with how fast a side can play (though what you said was a 'Marcus neutral' statement) and the same argument has been made with the All Blacks fascination with playing players like Beauden Barrett at 10 who can't orchestrate an attack like that in order to compound LQB into points. Even a 10 like Dmac is more a self creator than one that is a cog in a wider plan.


But I still don't think you'd be right if you've put down the sides lack of LQB (pretty sure I remember checking that stat) compared to the 6N as being something to do with a Marcus Smith side. We've seen other similar teams who rely on it being found out recently as well, I just think it's harder to get that flow on (lets not making it a debate about the relative strength of the hemispheres) now (hence said investigation into those games and contexts are required).


25 is also young, he is the best fit to take the side to a RWC. Ford or Farrell are not. Fin could be, but as you've said with Marcus, that would require a lot of change elsewhere in the team 2 years out of a WC. Marcus will get a 6N to prove himself so to speak, unless Fin gets in quick, I don't think you should want a change if you get a couple of reasonable results. But then you expect England to be in the top 3 of the world, let alone the 6N...

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market
Search